2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8705.00270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural phenomenology and the everyday

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adorno (1973, pp. 26f) affirms phenomenology's attention to the “reciprocal constitution of consciousness and objectivity” (Clucas, , p. 15) without its ideological blinders and systematization. For this to be a successful program, Adorno contends, we must place consciousness and practices in social‐structural context.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Adorno (1973, pp. 26f) affirms phenomenology's attention to the “reciprocal constitution of consciousness and objectivity” (Clucas, , p. 15) without its ideological blinders and systematization. For this to be a successful program, Adorno contends, we must place consciousness and practices in social‐structural context.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although Adorno was critical of phenomenology throughout his career (e.g., Adorno ; see Dallmayr ; Valone ; Wolff ; Gordon ), he aspires to continue phenomenology’s attention to the ‘reciprocal constitution of consciousness and objectivity’ (Clucas , p. 15) without its ideological blinders and systematisation (Adorno , p. 26f), as well as placing consciousness in social‐structural context. We argue Adorno’s programme can contribute to Schutz’s tripartite theory of relevance types.…”
Section: Toward a Political Economy Of Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trajectory of analysis and theorizing habitus and its technocultural dimensions is evoked in what has since been characterized as ‘cultural phenomenology’ (Connor, 2000; Clucas, 2000; Csordas, 1999; Richardson and Third, 2009). Cultural phenomenology has been described as a ‘methodological attitude’ – a critical disposition rather than a formal method – ‘that demands attention to bodiliness’ (Csordas, 1999: 148) and body–technology relations (Richardson, 2012; Richardson and Wilken, 2017), which calls for ‘somatic modes of attention’ that ‘highlight the engagement of sensory modalities’ (Csordas, 1999: 151), including touch.…”
Section: Habitus Du Corps: a Cultural Phenomenology Of The Tactile Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%