Cultural omnivores or culturally homeless? Exploring the shifting cultural identities of the upwardly mobile

Abstract

This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Drawing on a large-scale survey of British comedy taste and 24 follow-up interviews, this paper strongly challenges existing representations of the cultural omnivore. Among comedy consumers, I only find omnivorousness among one social group; the upwardly mobile. However, notably, the culture switching of these respondents does not seem to yield the social benefits assumed by other omnivore studies. In contrast, the life histories of these respondents reveals that omnivorousness is more a bi-product of life trajectories -whereby lowbrow comedy taste is established during childhood but then highbrow taste is added as cultural capital resources grow. Permanent repository linkSignificantly, though, this combination of tastes has more negative than positive implications, leaving socially mobile respondents largely uncertain of their cultural identities. While they lack the 'natural' confidence to communicate new, more legitimate, tastes as embodied cultural capital, their upwardly mobile trajectory means they are also acutely aware that the tastes of their youth are socially unacceptable and aesthetically inferior. In short, these comedy consumers are more accurately described as culturally homeless, caught with one foot in two different taste cultures.

“Eating isn’t just swallowing food”: Food practices in the context of social class trajectory

“…Similarly, in a study of middle-class dinner parties one woman saw her desire to provide high-quality food as distancing herself "from the shame of growing up poor, and specifically from the embarrassment of her family's struggle to afford enough food for guests" (Mellor et al, 2010, p. 11). Upward class mobility may leave people ever-conscious of their precarious social positions, anxious to renounce their class origins, yet not entirely comfortable with their new class locations (Friedman, 2012). Double binds may be equally painful for the downwardly mobile.…”

Social mobility and musical tastes: A reappraisal of the social meaning of taste eclecticism

“…This cultural dissonance, which can be expressed in the terms of habitus clive´ (Bourdieu, 2004;Bennett, 2007) or plural (Lahire, 2010(Lahire, [2001), also recalls the kind of cultural ambivalence experienced by the ''scholarship boys'' described by Richard Hoggart (1992[1957) and the cultural discomfort of all the 'class defectors' (Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1992;Friedman, 2014). Taste eclecticism can thus be considered as a by-product of social mobility, especially upward mobility (Friedman, 2012;Friedman & Kuipers, 2013).…”

Positionings of the black middle-classes: understanding identity construction beyond strategic assimilation

“…This involves examining the social and cultural capitals which are ascribed higher value towards the ethnoracial autonomous pole, usually involving cultural and social spaces that are free from white influence -including black theatre plays and black art exhibitions. This is contrasted to the practices of those oscillating towards strategic assimilation, who are 'cultural omnivores' (Friedman 2012) -although they display affinity towards socializing with people from the same ethnoracial background as themselves, they also socialize in white middle-class milieus in order to establish a degree of cultural equity with whites.…”