Cultural landscapes and ethnographic cartographies: Scandinavian-American and American Indian knowledge of the land

Toupal, Rebecca; Zedeño, María Nieves; Stoffle, Richard W.; Barabe, P

doi:10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00024-7

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most consultations are project specific and focus only on sites that may be affected by a project (Anschuetz and Dongoske 2017; Ferguson 2009; Watkins and Ferguson 2005). Landscape elements and characteristics that may be of equal or greater interest to stakeholders—such as important plants, water resources, habitats, viewsheds, soundscapes, and landmarks—are often ignored or underappreciated (Colwell and Ferguson 2014; Ferguson et al 2015; Heilen and Altschul 2019; Stoffle et al 2009; Toupal et al 2001; Zedeño et al 1997). The way some archaeological investigations are conducted has the effect of omitting, ignoring, or diminishing Indigenous perspectives while simultaneously colonizing, appropriating, and disrupting Indigenous heritage and lifeways (Dongoske and Anschuetz 2021).…”

Section: Accounting For Bias In Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Refining Archaeological Data Collection and Management

Heilen

Manney²

2023

Adv. archaeol. pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most archaeological investigations in the United States and other countries must comply with preservation laws, especially if they are on government property or supported by government funding. Academic and cultural resource management (CRM) studies have explored various social, temporal, and environmental contexts and produce an ever-increasing volume of archaeological data. More and more data are born digital, and many legacy data are digitized. There is a building effort to synthesize and integrate data at a massive scale and create new data standards and management systems. Taxpayer dollars often fund archaeological studies that are intended, in spirit, to promote historic preservation and provide public benefits. However, the resulting data are difficult to access and interoperationalize, and they are rarely collected and managed with their long-term security, accessibility, and ethical reuse in mind. Momentum is building toward open data and open science as well as Indigenous data sovereignty and governance. The field of archaeology is reaching a critical point where consideration of diverse constituencies, concerns, and requirements is needed to plan data collection and management approaches moving forward. This theme issue focuses on challenges and opportunities in archaeological data collection and management in academic and CRM contexts.

show abstract

Section: Accounting For Bias In Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Refining Archaeological Data Collection and Management

Heilen

Manney²

2023

Adv. archaeol. pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is thus first necessary to understand the cultural meanings of places and how these are integrated into heritage landscapes [14]. Stoffle, Halmo and Austin [15] defined kinds of cultural landscapes; while Toupal et al [16] provide a methodology for landscape studies. Rossler [17] argues that cultural landscapes are a significant component in sustainability development because they are important in the economic and social life of many countries.…”

Section: Operationalizing Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sustainable use of Native American heritage places is viewed in this analysis as serving to preserve their traditional purposes and sustaining the cultural landscapes that give them heritage meaning. The research concerns the potential impacts of heritage tourism to selected Native American places at Arches National Park, Canyonlands National Park, and Hovenweep National Monument. The impacts of tourists on a heritage place must be understood as having both potential effects on the place itself and on an integrated cultural landscape. Impacts to one place potentially change other places. Their functions in a Native American landscape, and the integrity of the landscape itself. The analysis is based on 696 interviews with representatives from nine tribes and pueblos, who, in addition to defining the cultural meaning of places, officially made 349 heritage management recommendations. The U.S. National Park Service interprets Natives American resources and then brings millions of tourists to these through museums, brochures, outdoor displays, and ranger-guided tours. Native American ethnographic study participants argued that tourist education and regulation can increase the sustainability of Native American places in a park and can help protect related places beyond the park.

show abstract

“…These three studies assess how tourist behaviors can impact the sustainability of both places and landscapes It is thus first necessary to understand the cultural meanings of places and how these are integrated into heritage landscapes 5 . Stoffle, Halmo and Austin 6 defined kinds of cultural landscapes; while Toupal et al 7 provide a methodology for landscape studies. Rossler 8 argues that cultural landscapes are a significant component in sustainability development because they are an important in the economic and social life of many countries.…”

Section: Operationalizing Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks

Stoffle¹,

Seowtewa²,

Kays³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable use of Native American heritage places is viewed in this analysis as serving to preserve their traditional purposes and sustain the cultural landscapes that give them heritage meaning. The research is about the potential impacts of heritage tourism to selected Native American places at Arches National Park, Canyonlands National Park, and Hovenweep National Monument. The impacts of tourists to a heritage place must be understood as having both potential effects on the place itself and on an integrated cultural landscape. Impacts to one place potentially change other places- functions in a Native American landscape and the integrity of the landscape itself. The analysis is based on 696 interviews with representatives from nine tribes and pueblos, who in addition to defining the cultural meaning of places, officially made 349 heritage management recommendations. The U.S. National Park Service interprets Natives American resources and then brings millions of tourists to these through museums, brochures, outdoor displays, and ranger-guided tours. Native American ethnographic study participants argued that tourist education and regulation can increase the sustainability of Native American places in a park and can help protect related places beyond the park.

show abstract

Cultural landscapes and ethnographic cartographies: Scandinavian-American and American Indian knowledge of the land

Cited by 14 publications

References 11 publications

Refining Archaeological Data Collection and Management

Refining Archaeological Data Collection and Management

Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks

Sustainable Heritage Tourism: Native American Preservation Recommendations at Arches, Canyonlands, and Hovenweep National Parks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About