The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-021-00603-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Geology, Cultural Biology, Cultural Taxonomy, and the Intangible Geoheritage as New Strategies for Geoconservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Every society, every person has its own precious treasure, which is called heritage. Special emphasis is placed on cultural heritage, which is related to traditions, culture and art (Reynard and Giusti, 2018;Sisto et al, 2020;Vale Caetano and Corral Martins de Oliveira Ponciano, 2021;Pijet-Migoń and Migoń, 2022). There is no doubt that cultural heritage is extremely important for knowing and understanding our past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every society, every person has its own precious treasure, which is called heritage. Special emphasis is placed on cultural heritage, which is related to traditions, culture and art (Reynard and Giusti, 2018;Sisto et al, 2020;Vale Caetano and Corral Martins de Oliveira Ponciano, 2021;Pijet-Migoń and Migoń, 2022). There is no doubt that cultural heritage is extremely important for knowing and understanding our past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It constitutes a complex entity that embraces both natural and anthropogenically induced and in situ and ex situ geological elements. The part of geodiversity that is important for societies due to its scientific value (Brilha 2016 ) and/or some other kind of exceptional value (cultural, educational, touristic; Caetano and Ponciano 2021 ) is regarded as geoheritage. Although some earlier definitions of urban geoheritage (Habibi et al 2018 ) refer to natural geological features and exposures, humans contribute to the overall geodiversity in urban areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of geocultural and geohistorical elements of diversity in the description of urban geodiversity involves the recognition of the material (tangible) and immaterial (intangible) elements of heritage. The concept of intangible cultural diversity is well established (Vecco 2010 ), and within Earth sciences, it was explored in studies of geomythology (Vitaliano 2007 ; Goemaere et al 2021 ), but its relation to the preselection and evaluation of geodiversity features is a relatively new field of study, recognised by Reynard ( 2009 ) and Rodrigues et al ( 2011 ), among others, and developed further in more recent contributions, for instance, Gordon ( 2018b ), Szepesi et al ( 2020 ) and Caetano and Ponciano ( 2021 ). Frequent interconnections between cultural, historical and geological heritage within the urban environment demand the inclusion of intangible geocultural assets in studies of urban geodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao focar a análise da Geomitologia nos fósseis, observa-se que os mesmos serviram de inspiração para várias narrativas míticas, como as do grifo, uma vez que ele teria sido baseado em concentrações fossilíferas dos dinossauros Protoceratops Granger & Gregory, 1923e Psittacosaurus Osborn, 1923 (Mayor 2001;Mayor & Heaney 1993). No Brasil, temos os casos do Mapinguari, criatura mítica da Amazônia provavelmente inspirada em fósseis de preguiças-gigantes (Ponciano 2015;Santos et al 2016), e dos icnofósseis de Araraquara e de Cianorte, que foram associados respectivamente a pegadas do Curupira e de santos (Caetano & Ponciano 2021;Souto & Neves 2018), além de vários outros exemplos, muitos ainda em estudo, conforme veremos a seguir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified