2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908889106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural evolution and individual development of openness and conservatism

Abstract: We present a model of cultural evolution in which an individual's propensity to engage in social learning is affected by social learning itself. We assume that individuals observe cultural traits displayed by others and decide whether to copy them based on their overall preference for the displayed traits. Preferences, too, can be transmitted between individuals. Our results show that such cultural dynamics tends to produce conservative individuals, i.e., individuals who are reluctant to copy new traits. Openn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at time step = 0 all individuals were social learners, and at time step = 100 all were individual learners), and the decrease affected a proportion d ( d  = 0.1,0.2,0.3) of the population. This model condition corresponds to a habit formation/conservatism bias246465.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at time step = 0 all individuals were social learners, and at time step = 100 all were individual learners), and the decrease affected a proportion d ( d  = 0.1,0.2,0.3) of the population. This model condition corresponds to a habit formation/conservatism bias246465.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghirlanda and colleagues [79][80][81] showed that openness can be maintained but only when openness, and effectiveness as a 36 demonstrator, are determined by multiple traits, such that individuals must first remain open to learn 37 all of the traits needed to be effective demonstrators, before becoming conservative. Irrespective of 38 these particular conclusions, these models demonstrate that when the tendency to learn from others 39 can itself be learned from others, then cultural dynamics emerge that we would not expect if social 40 learning were genetically fixed and stable over the lifetime.…”
Section: The Consequences Of the Social Learning Of Social Learning 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal 324 models are needed of these situations. The few models that have explicitly addressed the social 325 learning of social learning [79][80][81] confirm that novel dynamics can emerge that would not be 326 expected if learning strategies were genetically specified (Box 3). 327…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, given the known differences between the dynamics of genetic and cultural inheritance, this may not necessarily be the case. In subsequent models, Enquist and colleagues explored this further (Acerbi et al 2009;Ghirlanda et al 2006), showing that when the tendency to engage in social learning can itself be socially learned, this gradually reduces individuals' reliance on social information. This is because while social learners may learn from nonsocial learners to become non-social learners, the reverse is less likely: non-social learners do not learn from social learners because, by definition, they do not learn socially.…”
Section: Are Social Learning Biases Learned or Innate?mentioning
confidence: 99%