Cultural Diversity

Alvarez, Allen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_128-1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They revive the discussion on how inclusive we should be of diverse issues, as well as on approaches to public deliberation of these diverse issues. Should we ban certain forms of reasoning that are identified with specific ideologies because they seem to threaten the ideals of neutrality or objectivity that protects the integrity of public discourse (Alvarez 2014)? Or should we promote a more open and inclusive discussion that engages even topics or methods that some may consider 'harmful' to public discourse (Thorseth 2006)?…”

Section: Introduction Open Section Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Obligations in public philosophical discourse

Alvarez¹,

Thorseth²,

Carson³

2018

Etikk Praksis - Nord J Appl Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Four papers are included in this November 2018 special issue Open Section. First is by Bjørn Hofmann and Siri Granum Carson titled Filosofiens rolle i det offentlige ordskiftet: Hvordan har debatten om sorteringssamfunnet i 2017 påvirket forholdet mellom filosofi og samfunn? En innholdsanalyse (The role of philosophy in public debate - A content analysis of the debate on the "sorting society" in Norway in 2017). Second, Provokativ offentlig filosofi (Provocative Public Philosophy) by Aksel Braanen Sterri. Third, Steinar Bøyum’s The Democratic Duty to Educate Oneself. And fourth, Jonas Jakobsen and Kjersti Fjørtoft’s In defence of moderate Inclusivism: Revisiting Rawls and Habermas.

show abstract

Section: Introduction Open Section Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%