Abstract:Le Blanc A. Cultural districts, a new strategy for regional development? The South-East Cultural District in Sicily, Regional Studies. The industrialization of cultural production and a strong trend for the development of regional networks have recently led to the creation of new spatial and economic forms called 'cultural districts'. However, these new economic systems rely on very different geographical bases, types of products, and developmental processes. In Italy, the first cultural district was created i… Show more
“…CDs in Bologna provide leadership and supervision to 56 municipalities, over 250 cultural organizations and hundreds of associations. The South-East CD in Sicily offers different itineraries across the UNESCO site of Noto, renowned worldwide for its baroque architecture (Le Blanc, 2010). In Lombardy, CDs funded by Fondazione Cariplo also engage in cultural planning.…”
Section: Operating and Non-operating Cdsmentioning
Culture-driven urban and regional strategies have grown since the 1980s in Europe and beyond. Countless initiatives for creative clusters, cultural quarters and culture-led urban policies have mushroomed since the mid-1990s. Being exceptionally rich and dense in cultural amenities and institutions, creative production and cultural consumption, Italy seemed to be the natural ground for such a cultural turn in policymaking. In fact, Italy has been the cradle for cultural districts (CDs) since the early 2000s, fostering both analytical and normative speculations and experiments. Despite this richness, a systematic study of CD policy implementation is lacking and several questions are still pending, in Italy as well as in other countries. For example, how diverse are the CD experiences being developed; and what are the aims and core activities, the urban and regional settings and development effects? This paper presents an original survey of 68 experimentations that were officially labelled as 'cultural districts' over the last 15 years in Italy: as such it constitutes the first attempt at a nationwide comprehensive analysis of CD policy. Even though the major importance of CDs as an analytical tool is acknowledged, the evidence gathered in this study shows the fuzziness and inconsistencies in the implementation of CD policy in Italy. The analysis shows the uneven regional geography of CDs, stresses the large variety of contents and promoters and high rate of failure, and the limited degree of specialization and integration with cultural industries. The paper reconsiders critically the policy notion and practice of CDs in Italy and calls for further international scholarly and policy debates.
“…CDs in Bologna provide leadership and supervision to 56 municipalities, over 250 cultural organizations and hundreds of associations. The South-East CD in Sicily offers different itineraries across the UNESCO site of Noto, renowned worldwide for its baroque architecture (Le Blanc, 2010). In Lombardy, CDs funded by Fondazione Cariplo also engage in cultural planning.…”
Section: Operating and Non-operating Cdsmentioning
Culture-driven urban and regional strategies have grown since the 1980s in Europe and beyond. Countless initiatives for creative clusters, cultural quarters and culture-led urban policies have mushroomed since the mid-1990s. Being exceptionally rich and dense in cultural amenities and institutions, creative production and cultural consumption, Italy seemed to be the natural ground for such a cultural turn in policymaking. In fact, Italy has been the cradle for cultural districts (CDs) since the early 2000s, fostering both analytical and normative speculations and experiments. Despite this richness, a systematic study of CD policy implementation is lacking and several questions are still pending, in Italy as well as in other countries. For example, how diverse are the CD experiences being developed; and what are the aims and core activities, the urban and regional settings and development effects? This paper presents an original survey of 68 experimentations that were officially labelled as 'cultural districts' over the last 15 years in Italy: as such it constitutes the first attempt at a nationwide comprehensive analysis of CD policy. Even though the major importance of CDs as an analytical tool is acknowledged, the evidence gathered in this study shows the fuzziness and inconsistencies in the implementation of CD policy in Italy. The analysis shows the uneven regional geography of CDs, stresses the large variety of contents and promoters and high rate of failure, and the limited degree of specialization and integration with cultural industries. The paper reconsiders critically the policy notion and practice of CDs in Italy and calls for further international scholarly and policy debates.
“…Similarly, while international definitions refer to a CD as an area of a city, or a neighborhood, other Italian definitions emphasize the relational aspect of CDs (Valentino, 2003), and as a ''mix of top-down planned elements and emergent, self-organized activities" (Sacco, Tavano Blessi, & Nuccio, 2008, p. 3). The term Cultural District has been used to designate various types of cultural clusters, from neighborhood level (Mommaas, 2004;Stern & Seifert, 2007 to city-wide (Frost-Kumpf, 1998) and regional networks (Le Blanc, 2010). Several authors have highlighted the need for greater conceptual clarity by making distinctions and classifications of CDs: Cooke and Lazzeretti (2008) underscored the need to conceptually distinguish between creative businesses clusters and cultural amenity concentrations; Stern and Seifert (2007) pointed out the difference between 'natural' Cultural Districts and policydriven ones.…”
Section: Analyzing and Planning Cultural Districts: The Current Debatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: Cooke and Lazzeretti et al, 2008;Lazzeretti et al, 2008;Lorenzini, 2011;Pratt, 2008;Santagata, 2002;Scott, 1997) and the other concerned with urban planning and cultural policy interventions for the stimulation or creation of cultural clusters as areas for cultural consumption and production (e.g. : Frost-Kumpf, 1998; Le Blanc, 2010;Mommaas, 2004;Sacco et al, 2008;Stern & Seifert, 2010). The two acceptations are often tacitly adopted and explored across policy and geography studies, without pointing out the similarities, differences and implications that mapping has for policy making and vice versa.…”
Section: Analyzing and Planning Cultural Districts: The Current Debatmentioning
In the past 15 years, cultural and creative industries have been center-stage in international and national debates. Policymakers promoted culture and creativity in dedicated initiatives and the need for evidence-based policy has prompted governments to undertake broad-scope cultural mapping, in order to identify spatially-defined systems of cultural and creative activities, such as clusters and districts. This has specifically been the case in Italy where, currently, the term “cultural district” is indifferently adopted for both analyzing a spatial conformation of cultural production and consumption and for promoting specific policies targeting the social organizations managing these activities. It has not yet been questioned whether these two acceptations should be separated or not. In order to address such a question, this paper reviews the relevant national and international literature, provides an overview of Cultural Districts in Italy explaining the contextual characteristics and constraints. It draws on two in-depth case studies: one mainly focusing on cultural mapping and the other on policy intervention. The authors maintain that it is not appropriate to use the concept as an analytical unit as well as a ready-made policy measure, at least with reference to Italy. Significant distinction should be made since the cultural district model has high explicative relevance but it needs to be reconsidered as a policy instrument
“…Th e cultural development in the presented case study is coordinated at the regional level, similarly to the development in Sicily (Le Blanc, 2010) and Nuremberg (BialkWolf, Pechlaner, & Nordhorn, 2013), while innovative IT is used to facilitate strong stakeholder engagement, similarly to the case of Genova (Chiabai, Paskaleva, & Lombardi, 2013). In contrast to the cities of Istanbul, Pecs and Essen (Polat, 2013) and Lille (Baudelle & Krauss, 2014), the city of Lens and the wider region of Nord-Pas-de-Calais have not used the capital of culture status to promote themselves internationally.…”
Abstract:The principal aim of this paper is to investigate the relocalization process of the world famous Louvre museum into an ex-coal mining region in the northern France. The further analysis has shown that the project is embedded into the wider regional cultural innovation policy. This policy, apart from development of Louvre-Lens museum, also focuses on development of the cultural offer in the ex-coal mining zone through the WHS (World Heritage Status), as well as in Lille-the former (2004) European capital of culture. All three cultural attractions are located in the region of Nord-Pas-de-Calais. An important part of the regional policy was the promotion and active development of cooperation between all three regional cultural partners, as well as active involvement with various cultural and tourism stakeholders. The development pursued primarily social and cultural objectives attempting to revitalize an ex-coal mining region which suffered high unemployment rate due to deindustrialization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.