2006
DOI: 10.1177/0022022106292079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Display Rules Drive Eye Gaze During Thinking

Abstract: The authors measured the eye gaze displays of Canadian, Trinidadian, and Japanese participants as they answered questions for which they either knew, or had to derive, the answers. When they knew the answers, Trinidadians maintained the most eye contact, whereas Japanese maintained the least. When thinking about the answers to questions, Canadians and Trinidadians looked up, whereas Japanese looked down. Thus, for humans, gaze displays while thinking are at least in part culturally determined.Keywords eye gaze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Error bars show 95 % within-participants confidence intervals. Fixations were generally located above the vertical midpoint, perhaps reflecting a tendency to look upward during problem solving, at least in Westerners (McCarthy, Lee, Itakura, & Muir, 2006) = 0.038°/value, SD = 0.035, 95 % CI: 0.025, 0.052), t(27) = 5.85, p < .0001, d = 1.11, replicating Experiment 1, but the ycoordinate slopes did not (M = -0.010°/value, SD = 0.039, 95 % CI: -0.025, 0.005), t(27) = 1.31, p > .2. Thus, after eliminating procedural confounds that may have primed vertical eye movements, horizontal gaze patterns continued to reflect the total hand value and were not driven merely by the last card's value, whereas vertical gaze patterns were weaker and driven solely by the last card's value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error bars show 95 % within-participants confidence intervals. Fixations were generally located above the vertical midpoint, perhaps reflecting a tendency to look upward during problem solving, at least in Westerners (McCarthy, Lee, Itakura, & Muir, 2006) = 0.038°/value, SD = 0.035, 95 % CI: 0.025, 0.052), t(27) = 5.85, p < .0001, d = 1.11, replicating Experiment 1, but the ycoordinate slopes did not (M = -0.010°/value, SD = 0.039, 95 % CI: -0.025, 0.005), t(27) = 1.31, p > .2. Thus, after eliminating procedural confounds that may have primed vertical eye movements, horizontal gaze patterns continued to reflect the total hand value and were not driven merely by the last card's value, whereas vertical gaze patterns were weaker and driven solely by the last card's value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation relates to instructions to maintain eye contact; these might be ineffective with Japanese and other non-Western cultures for whom such eye contact goes against a societal norm. These instructions might induce inordinately high levels of anxiety and be distracting within these cultures (McCarthy, Lee, Itakura, & Muir, 2006), even for truth tellers. Finally, the motivation of our participants to appear truthful was not as high as that of actual witnesses lying to protect someone.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates Japan's neutral (non expressive) business culture (Trompenaars, 1994). Research shows that the Japanese typically give very little direct eye contact (McCarthy, et al, 2006) and look down as a sign of respect.…”
Section: ©2010 Journal Of the Scholarship Of Teaching And Learning Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that the Japanese typically give very little direct eye contact (McCarthy, Lee, Itakura, & Muir, 2006) and look down as a sign of respect.…”
Section: -318mentioning
confidence: 99%