Cultural differences in spiritual care: findings of an Israeli oncologic questionnaire examining patient interest in spiritual care

Abstract

BackgroundAs professional spiritual care (chaplaincy) is introduced to new cultures worldwide, it bears examining which elements of screening and care are universal and, for those elements showing cultural difference, to study them in each culture. No quantitative spiritual care patient study had previously been done in Israel. Our objectives were twofold: 1) to examine who wants spiritual care in Israel, including demographic and clinical variables, and to compare against other results worldwide to further develop universal screening protocols 2) to see what patients want from spiritual care specifically in the Israeli setting.MethodsSelf-administered patient questionnaire examining spirituality/religiosity, interest in spiritual care (subdivided by type of care), and key demographic, social, and clinical data. The study setting was an Israeli oncology center at which spiritual care had been recently introduced.ResultsData from 364 oncology patient questionnaires found 41% interest in spiritual care, as compared to 35%-54% in American studies. Having previously been visited by a spiritual caregiver predicted patient interest in further spiritual care (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.6), suggesting that the new service is being well-received. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified additional predictors of openness to receiving spiritual care: self-describing as somewhat/very spiritual vs. not spiritual (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.9 and 6.3, 95% CI 1.8-8.6 and 2.6-15.1) or traditional/religious vs. secular (AOR 2.2 and 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6 and 1.1-4.0); and receiving one visit a week or less from family and friends (AOR 5.6, 95% CI 2.1-15.1). These findings are in line with previous American studies, suggesting universality across cultures that could be utilized in screening. Differences in demographic data and medical condition were not significant predictors of patient interest, suggesting a cultural difference, where age and education were predictors in the American context. Levels of interest in explicitly religious or spiritual support such as prayer or addressing religious/spiritual questions were much lower than in other cultures.ConclusionsResults illustrate the demand for and satisfaction with the new Israeli service. The cross-cultural comparison found both culture-dependent and possibly universal predictors of patient interest, and found lower interest in Israel for explicitly religious/spiritual types of support.

Concordance between nurses' perception of their ability to provide spiritual care and the identified spiritual needs of hospitalized patients: A cross‐sectional observational study

“…It should be noted that the findings in the present study might have been influenced by the cultural backgrounds of the patients or nurses. An Israeli study on oncology patients reported that 41% were interested in receiving spiritual care, as compared with 35-54% of patients in US studies (Schultz et al, 2014). However, even within the same ethnic group, various influences can affect a person's view of spirituality.…”

Spirituality and Spiritual Care Competence among Expatriate Nurses Working in Saudi Arabia

“…However, the provision of spiritual care to patients faces many challenges, such as gender differences (Melhem et al 2016), inadequate time, staffing issues, and lack of academic preparation, including the nurses' own perception toward spirituality and spiritual care, which affect their competence in delivering quality service (Chan 2010). Although spirituality is a known phenomenon, spiritual care in other settings may be different due to a culture-specific aspect, including nurses' religious and spiritual approaches in a clinical environment (Schultz et al 2014). Thus, many scholars have recommended an increase in studies about nursing spiritual care in different settings to develop a clearer understanding about this phenomenon (Bowers and Rieg 2014;Labrague et al 2016;Cruz et al 2016aCruz et al , 2016b.…”

Understanding the Attitudes of Patients with Cancer Toward Complementary and Alternative Therapies

“…34,35 The supportive role was traditionally fulfilled by nurses; however, in the current health care system, the nurse's workload makes it difficult for them to refer to the relational aspects of their interactions with patients, but rather to practical and directive ones. 36,37 Previous studies have demonstrated that this function is also fulfilled by the practice of spiritual care, which addressed patients' needs for an attentive and caring attitude, 38 as well as support and comfort. 39 Most of the patients who did not complete the six sessions referred to CAM, due to external reasons, mainly a nurse's recommendation.…”