Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming

Abstract: Supporting creativity via collaborative group brainstorming is a prevalent practice in organizations. Today's technology makes it easy for international and intercultural group members to brainstorm together remotely, but surprisingly little is known about how culture and medium shape the underlying brainstorming process. In a laboratory study, we examined the influences of individual cultural background (American versus Chinese), group cultural composition (same-versus mixed-culture groups), and communication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach portrays technology as a culturally neutral stimulus, glossing over the basic concern that different collaboration technologies may be inherently structured so as to facilitate one culture's communication repertoire and impede or disadvantage another's. Wang, Fussell, and Setlock (2009), for example, noted that in mixed-culture subject groups (Americans and Chinese), Chinese subjects increased their level of behavioral responsiveness nearly to that of Americans, suggesting more adaptation by Chinese subjects to "reconcile inconsistent communication styles" (p. 676). Technologies may thus present a compounded disadvantage for certain members of an intercultural collaboration when (1) the technology embeds cultural paradigms incongruent with the culture of those members, and (2) the disadvantaged culture also tends to value adaptation more highly than the other represented cultures.…”
Section: Collaboration Technologies In Global Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach portrays technology as a culturally neutral stimulus, glossing over the basic concern that different collaboration technologies may be inherently structured so as to facilitate one culture's communication repertoire and impede or disadvantage another's. Wang, Fussell, and Setlock (2009), for example, noted that in mixed-culture subject groups (Americans and Chinese), Chinese subjects increased their level of behavioral responsiveness nearly to that of Americans, suggesting more adaptation by Chinese subjects to "reconcile inconsistent communication styles" (p. 676). Technologies may thus present a compounded disadvantage for certain members of an intercultural collaboration when (1) the technology embeds cultural paradigms incongruent with the culture of those members, and (2) the disadvantaged culture also tends to value adaptation more highly than the other represented cultures.…”
Section: Collaboration Technologies In Global Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballagas, Memon, Reiners, & Borchers, 2007;Brewer, Mainwaring, & Dourish, 2008;Hagen, Robertson, Kan, & Sadler, 2005;Mainwaring, Anderson, & Chang, 2004;Williams, Anderson, & Dourish, 2008). A sharp increase in papers about information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D), localization, and crosscultural interactions is evident from 2007 to present (e.g., Diamant, Fussell, & Lo, 2009;Olson & Luo, 2007;Wang, Fussell, & Setlock, 2009;Wyche, Magnus, & Grinter, 2009). Some of this work has challenged taxonomic views of culture, exploring instead the culturally and socially situated experiences and meanings of technology in varying locales (e.g., Irani, Vertesi, Dourish, Philip, & Grinter, 2010;Lindtner, Anderson, & Dourish, 2012;Williams et al, 2008).…”
Section: Prior Methodological Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Wang et al (2009) defined culture as "patterns of beliefs and values that are manifested in practices, behaviors, and various artifacts shared by members of an organization or a nation". Culture influences what social norms individuals recognize and what behaviors they believe they should or should not perform.…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%