2021
DOI: 10.1093/ornithology/ukab061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural conformity and persistence in Dickcissel song are higher in locations in which males show high site fidelity

Abstract: Dickcissel (Spiza americana) males occupying territories in cropland sites produced songs that were less similar on average to other Dickcissel songs in their neighborhood than did Dickcissels living in grasslands, where conformity to the local vocal culture was higher. Further, Dickcissel vocal culture changed more quickly over time in cropland sites relative to grassland sites. These differences may have resulted from the lower site fidelity we observed in Dickcissel males in cropland sites relative to grass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that this variation may also result of vocal similarities among some individuals. Vocal similarity may be a result of many factors, including social or environmental accommodation (Ruch et al, 2018), genetic relatedness (Hauser, 1996), or population processes such as turnover rates (Parker et al, 2022). It is possible that certain individuals in our study associate with each other more frequently and therefore their calls converge (as summarised in Ruch et al, 2018), or that a more similar genetic make-up results in similar build and therefore sounds produced (e.g., in pandas (Charlton et al, 2009) or mouse lemurs (Zimmermann and Hafen, 2001)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that this variation may also result of vocal similarities among some individuals. Vocal similarity may be a result of many factors, including social or environmental accommodation (Ruch et al, 2018), genetic relatedness (Hauser, 1996), or population processes such as turnover rates (Parker et al, 2022). It is possible that certain individuals in our study associate with each other more frequently and therefore their calls converge (as summarised in Ruch et al, 2018), or that a more similar genetic make-up results in similar build and therefore sounds produced (e.g., in pandas (Charlton et al, 2009) or mouse lemurs (Zimmermann and Hafen, 2001)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual analysis of animal sounds is an important technique in a wide range of research areas, including sound production (Dziak et al., 2017 ; Fitch & Hauser, 1995 ; Herbst et al., 2012 ; Monte et al., 2020 ), identifying species and populations (Forti et al., 2017 ; Leroy et al., 2021 ; Wei et al., 2022 ), studying animal communication (Dutour et al., 2021 ; King et al., 2021 ; Vergne et al., 2009 ) and culture (Lachlan et al., 2018 ; Parker et al., 2022 ; Warren et al., 2020 ) and for estimating spatial behaviour (Blumstein et al., 2011 ; Mellinger et al., 2007 ; Rogers et al., 2013 ) and abundance (Dawson & Efford, 2009 ; Marques et al., 2013 ; Sugai et al., 2019 ; Thompson et al., 2010 ; Thorne & Dawson, 1974 ). Additionally, many bioacoustics software packages operate not on the sounds themselves, but on their visualisations (LeBien et al., 2020 ; Marchal et al., 2022 ; Mellinger & Clark, 2000 ; Miller et al., 2022 ; Popescu et al., 2013 ; Ulloa et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%