2003
DOI: 10.1080/1362102032000098904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Citizenship in the ‘Cultural’ Society: A Cosmopolitan Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the basic elements of citizenship such as membership, belonging, and rights and obligations, women's cultural citizenship represents a continuous effort to shed the assumption that they are lower and second-class citizens, "incorporated into explicit consideration of family and as extensions of men's agency." [9]. The nature of inclusion and exclusion may refer to a sense of belonging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the basic elements of citizenship such as membership, belonging, and rights and obligations, women's cultural citizenship represents a continuous effort to shed the assumption that they are lower and second-class citizens, "incorporated into explicit consideration of family and as extensions of men's agency." [9]. The nature of inclusion and exclusion may refer to a sense of belonging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural competences may be in the sense of membership, belonging, rights or obligations. Women were, and over and over again continue to be, seen as neglected State citizens, and even considered as occupying the lowest citizenship rank throughout most of human history [9]. They are situated in this discriminative stand and try to engage socially, taking advantage of citizenship spheres.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We support the general criticism of political science that, even when it appears to attend to questions of citizens' engagement with democratic processes (Almond and Verba, 1963;Putnam, 2000), it fails to give an account of the experiential dimension of citizenship (LeBlanc, 1999) or the hidden cultural hierarchies which shape that experience (Croteau, 1995;Pateman, 1989). Recent work on citizenship (Isin and Turner, 2002;Stevenson, 2003) has greatly expanded the theoretical frame within which we understand the nature and boundaries of politics, 3 but here it is the empirical failings of political science with which we are concerned. Empirically, the problem is partly methodological: political science' overwhelming emphasis on survey methods has blocked a consideration of more subtle citizen reflexivity.…”
Section: Tracking the Reflexivity Of The (Dis)engaged Citizenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the material and expressive aspects of transnational student assemblages, we find the research literature on transnationalism, cosmopolitanism and diaspora particularly interesting, as they concern how cultural transnationalism refers to the transference and reconfiguration of cultural symbols, practices and artefacts across different national cultures and nation-states (Hannerz, 1996;Joseph, 1999;Pries, 2001;Stevenson, 2003;Voigt-Graf, 2004). Werbner (1999: 19-20) makes a useful distinction between (i) transnational migrants, "who move and build encapsulated cultural worlds around them", and (ii) cosmopolitans, who "familiarise themselves with other cultures".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%