2016
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract201642219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Appropriation Without Cultural Essentialism?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors contend that cultural appropriation is “morally problematic” as it may involve “misrepresentation, misuse, and theft of the stories, styles, and material heritage of people who have been historically dominated and remain socially marginalized” (Matthes, , p. 343). Despite the topic's importance and sensitivity, it has been largely ignored by place‐branding scholars and practitioners in general and in particular by those involved with destination marketing, tourism, and hospitality.…”
Section: Cultural Appropriation and Tourism Destinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors contend that cultural appropriation is “morally problematic” as it may involve “misrepresentation, misuse, and theft of the stories, styles, and material heritage of people who have been historically dominated and remain socially marginalized” (Matthes, , p. 343). Despite the topic's importance and sensitivity, it has been largely ignored by place‐branding scholars and practitioners in general and in particular by those involved with destination marketing, tourism, and hospitality.…”
Section: Cultural Appropriation and Tourism Destinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident in language, religion, agriculture, folklore, food, and other cultural elements” (Arewa, , p. 26). Nevertheless, a growing number of detractors are questioning the “morality” of the “misrepresentation, misuse, and theft of the stories, styles, and material heritage of people who have been historically dominated and remain socially marginalized” (Matthes, , p. 343).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking utterances from other cultures might be viewed as something to be cautious of but, in total, cultural appropriation may not be ethically or morally wrong (Young, 2005). However, this type of philosophical discussion has the potential to purport an essentialist view, where cultures are classified as homogenous collectives -a dangerous and possibly damaging cultural view (Matthes, 2016), that tends to distinguish insiders from outsiders based on cultural authenticity claims. Essentialism negates the nuances within groups, segregating voices within an imposed classification system that conceals the spectrum of difference within a classified group.…”
Section: Addressivity Appropriation and The Dabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many examples of shifting sovereignty over nearby territories (as tural property must be justified by appeal to a universal understanding of cultural products as the property of the particular culture that birthed them, independently of facts about socio-political power. 8 But advocates of cultural property need not be committed to such a principle, any more than an opponent of cultural appropriation must be committed to the claim that it is wrong for a native American to wear blue jeans (Matthes 2016;Todd 1990). Consistency only requires treating like cases alike, and principles that abstract away from the morally differentiating features of a case are distractions rather than objections.…”
Section: Cultural Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the first limitation, it's not clear that production by a member of a culture cannot be construed as grounding at least certain moral claims that might fit in the bundle of property rights. 3 For instance, production by a member of a particular culture might delineate moral restrictions on how that product is used or represented by cultural outsiders, especially in the context of appropriation of the product of a culturally marginalized group by members of a culturally dominant group (Matthes 2016). This would not necessarily require that the product play an important role in communal practices.…”
Section: Cultural Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%