2022
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2032259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

Abstract: Informal caregiving constitutes the mainstay of a society's care supply. Motivations for caring and continuing to provide care are crucial to understanding the nature of caregiver experiences and their relationship with the person/people they support. This systematic review of qualitative evidence examines determinants of motivations and willingness to provide informal care. One hundred and five qualitative studies published before August 2019 and fitting the inclusion criteria were identified, 84 of them pert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PRISMA diagram summarises the search flow (Figure 1) for the systematic review with the main reasons for study exclusion. From an initial identification of 9793 papers, 105 were considered eligible studies for a review of diverse determinants of motivations and willingness to provide care (Zarzycki, Morrison, et al, 2022; Zarzycki, Seddon, et al, 2022). From these, 37 studies addressing culturally specific motivations for providing informal care were selected for the current meta-ethnographic synthesis.
Figure 1.PRISMA flow chart of included studies.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PRISMA diagram summarises the search flow (Figure 1) for the systematic review with the main reasons for study exclusion. From an initial identification of 9793 papers, 105 were considered eligible studies for a review of diverse determinants of motivations and willingness to provide care (Zarzycki, Morrison, et al, 2022; Zarzycki, Seddon, et al, 2022). From these, 37 studies addressing culturally specific motivations for providing informal care were selected for the current meta-ethnographic synthesis.
Figure 1.PRISMA flow chart of included studies.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring motivations and willingness to care was completed (Zarzycki, Morrison, et al, 2022), from which studies describing cultural motivations in their findings were purposively selected for this meta-ethnographic synthesis. The goal of meta-ethnography is to systematically synthesise a body of qualitative research to create a ‘whole’ greater than the sum of its parts, offering new conceptual insights whilst preserving the ideas from the original studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the multidimensionality of ZBI-9 encompasses WaP, which has been consistently reported in both Asian and Western literature. 7 Indeed, WaP appears to be a common dimension among adult children caregivers, likely due to the influence of prevailing societal norms and perceived expectations of caregiving 24,25 or familial relationships-love and the wish to return the best care to loved ones. 26 Corrected item-total correlations were good for all items in the ZBI-9 with the exception of the 2 items from factor 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in light of findings from previous studies that the degree of religiosity seems to make a difference in quality of life: young people who do not consider religion to be important experience a lower quality of life (including in terms of having more psychological problems) than young people who do care about religion [ 19 , 34 , 35 ]. There are indications that religious values and norms are related to the provision of informal care in general, as these are seen as a motivating factor to provide help and continue doing so [ 36 ]. Dearden and Becker [ 37 ] showed that some young Muslims are against ‘cross-gender care’, which can have major consequences if the young person is the only suitable helper and must care for a loved one of the opposite gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%