Abstract:The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation for persons with psychiatric disabilities. Most persons with a history of mental disorder work productively and do not require accommodation. Many persons with serious mental illness need accommodation but are conscientious and productive workers. Difficulties inherent in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines are those of differentiating aspects of mental disorder from work-related conduct a… Show more
“…Table 4 reports means of the variables in the wage equation for each analysis group. Consistent with the findings of Mechanic et al (2002), persons with mental disorders are employed across the full spectrum of occupations and industries. Overall, mean hourly wages are 6 percent lower for workers with mental disorders than for workers without ($14.09 versus $14.85).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Mechanic (1998) argues that stigma may be one such factor. Research consistently shows that mental disorders generate strongly negative attitudes, comparable to the stigma ascribed to ex‐convicts or persons with AIDS (e.g., Royal and Roberts 1987; Tringo 1970; Westbrook, Legge, and Pennay 1993).…”
We present nationally representative estimates of unexplained employment and wage differentials between nondisabled persons and persons with mental disorders, a disabled group subject to exceptionally strong stigma. Estimates are provided for persons with mental disorders overall, and for subgroups of mood, anxiety, adjustment, and psychotic disorders. The results reveal distinctly different patterns of outcomes across subgroups, consistent with a severity gradient such that persons with adjustment disorders experience the most favorable outcomes, while persons with psychotic disorders experience the least favorable.
“…Table 4 reports means of the variables in the wage equation for each analysis group. Consistent with the findings of Mechanic et al (2002), persons with mental disorders are employed across the full spectrum of occupations and industries. Overall, mean hourly wages are 6 percent lower for workers with mental disorders than for workers without ($14.09 versus $14.85).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Mechanic (1998) argues that stigma may be one such factor. Research consistently shows that mental disorders generate strongly negative attitudes, comparable to the stigma ascribed to ex‐convicts or persons with AIDS (e.g., Royal and Roberts 1987; Tringo 1970; Westbrook, Legge, and Pennay 1993).…”
We present nationally representative estimates of unexplained employment and wage differentials between nondisabled persons and persons with mental disorders, a disabled group subject to exceptionally strong stigma. Estimates are provided for persons with mental disorders overall, and for subgroups of mood, anxiety, adjustment, and psychotic disorders. The results reveal distinctly different patterns of outcomes across subgroups, consistent with a severity gradient such that persons with adjustment disorders experience the most favorable outcomes, while persons with psychotic disorders experience the least favorable.
“…However, our results suggest that this may not be the case as the effect of depression in women was to bring the proportion taking IHR to that of men (50%). It may be that the greater interpersonal skills needed in roles such as personal support jobs makes them less compatible to continued working in the presence of depression (Mechanic, 1998). Women also reported different sources of pressure to retire than men.…”
Ill-health retirement is common in those with heart disease. Women appear to be particularly susceptible to the effects of comorbid depression. Given the policy emphasis on reducing the number of people leaving the workforce early, women with early heart disease may represent a particular group in whom interventions designed to detect and treat comorbid depression should be targeted.
“…Although the ADA prohibits employers from asking about mental illness during the job application process, some employers could attempt to screen out (by using cues such as affect, communication skills, or gaps in work history) those with mental illness because of what must be offered to disabled applicants once they are hired. 34 Therefore, the ADA could be more likely to protect to those with less severe types of mental illness who already have a job or who are able to hide their mental illness when applying for a job. This phenomenon also illustrates how stigmatizers may become more careful and perpetuate discriminatory behavior even if antidiscrimination laws have been implemented.…”
Section: Landmark Legislation For Mental Illness Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, antidiscrimination legislation in education and employment settings cannot protect disabled children whose parents are resistant to having their child labeled with a psychiatric disability, or job applicants and employees who are reluctant to disclose their mental health status to an employer. 6,34 …”
Section: Landmark Legislation For Mental Illness Discriminationmentioning
Stigma against mental illness is a complex construct with affective, cognitive, and behavioral components. Beyond its symbolic value, federal law can only directly address one component of stigma: discrimination.
This article reviews three landmark antidiscrimination laws that expanded protections over time for individuals with mental illness. Despite these legislative advances, protections are still not uniform for all subpopulations with mental illness. Furthermore, multiple components of stigma (e.g., prejudice) are beyond the reach of legislation, as demonstrated by the phenomenon of label avoidance; individuals may not seek protection from discrimination because of fear of the stigma that may ensue after disclosing their mental illness.
To yield the greatest improvements, antidiscrimination laws must be coupled with antistigma programs that directly address other components of stigma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.