1997
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: The McGurk effect in Chinese subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
143
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
143
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the employment of non-native language visual cues in the perception of the target contrasts by the experimental group is at odds with the hypothesis that tone language speakers are less likely to use visual information in non-native speech perception/production (Sekiyama, 1997;Sekiyama and Tohkura, 1993). In previous studies, Mandarin speakers showed a relatively lower degree of use of visual information in speech perception than non-tone language speakers (de Gelder and Vroomen, 1992).…”
Section: The Effect Of Articulatory Information On the Subjects' Percmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the employment of non-native language visual cues in the perception of the target contrasts by the experimental group is at odds with the hypothesis that tone language speakers are less likely to use visual information in non-native speech perception/production (Sekiyama, 1997;Sekiyama and Tohkura, 1993). In previous studies, Mandarin speakers showed a relatively lower degree of use of visual information in speech perception than non-tone language speakers (de Gelder and Vroomen, 1992).…”
Section: The Effect Of Articulatory Information On the Subjects' Percmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In previous studies, Mandarin speakers showed a relatively lower degree of use of visual information in speech perception than non-tone language speakers (de Gelder and Vroomen, 1992). It has been argued that since Mandarin is a tone language, L1-Mandarin speakers rely more on tones than on visual cues in speech perception (Sekiyama, 1997;Sekiyama and Tohkura, 1993). Moreover, Hazan et al (2006) indicated that L2 listeners may lose sensitivity to visemes that do not exist in their L1.…”
Section: The Effect Of Articulatory Information On the Subjects' Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reverse combination of an auditory nonlabial, /ka/ on a visual labial, /pa/ is known to hardly induce such an illusory fusion, resulting in a correct auditory percept, especially in Japanese participants. This is thought to be due to either the sound structure of Japanese or their nature of less reliance on visual information in speech perception (Sekiyama, 1997). In such a lack of audio-visual speech fusion, they are often aware of the discrepancy in audio-visual speech information, because the visual /pa/ (labial) and the correctly perceived voice, /ka/ (non-labial) is different with respect to the place of articulation.…”
Section: Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The McGurk effect is a striking phenomenon under incoherent AV information, where lip-read information in speech interferes with auditory perception of phonemes (McGurk & MacDonald 1976;Sekiyama & Tohkura 1991;Munhall et al 1996;Sekiyama 1997), suggesting a strong influence of vision (figure 1a). There are two typical responses in the McGurk effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%