2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural adaptation of the SADL (satisfaction with amplification in daily life) questionaire for Brazilian portuguese

Abstract: There are some motivational processes associated with the use of an Individual Sound Amplification Device (ISAD): acceptance, benefit and satisfaction.Objective: To make a cultural adaptation of the SADL (Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life) questionnaire to use with the Brazilian population; to assess its reproducibility and to describe its results in patients fit with an ISAD. Materials and Methods:Clinical study. Translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire; translation from English in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
16

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire (18) , adapted culturally to Brazilian Portuguese (19) , was applied to assess satisfaction. The instrument consists of 15 questions divided into four subscales: Positive effects (regarding acoustic and psychological benefits); Service and cost (regarding professional competence, product price and number of repairs); Negative factors (regarding amplification of environmental noise, presence of microphony and telephone use); and Personal image (regarding aesthetics and the stigma related to use of the device).…”
Section: This Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire (18) , adapted culturally to Brazilian Portuguese (19) , was applied to assess satisfaction. The instrument consists of 15 questions divided into four subscales: Positive effects (regarding acoustic and psychological benefits); Service and cost (regarding professional competence, product price and number of repairs); Negative factors (regarding amplification of environmental noise, presence of microphony and telephone use); and Personal image (regarding aesthetics and the stigma related to use of the device).…”
Section: This Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scales used were as follows: IT-MAIS, a questionnaire assessing auditory outcomes, the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), a questionnaire for assessing oral language, and Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP), which reviews speech perception in profound deaf children ≥5 years old [20][21][22][23] .…”
Section: Audiological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was translated into Portuguese and adapted to our cultural aspects by Mondelli et al [23] ; it was validated by Danieli et al [24] . The questionnaire results in an overall satisfaction score and a profile of subscales that address positive effects, service and value, negative characteristics, and personal image.…”
Section: Satisfaction With Amplification In Daily Life (Sadl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was translated into Portuguese and adapted to our cultural aspects by Mondelli et al [26] and validated by the study of Danieli et al [27] (Table 1). The questionnaire results in an overall satisfaction score and a profile of subscales that address positive effects, service and value, negative characteristics and personal image.…”
Section: Satisfaction Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%