Cultural Adaptation of a Dyadic Intervention for Korean Couples Coping with Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Cliniocians working with older Korean couples affected by dementia should consider cultural uniqueness in a life-story approach.

Life story books for people with dementia: a systematic review

“…The relationship between persons with dementia and their formal and informal caregivers appears to be improved and the expression of values and preferences of persons with dementia in LSBs can further contribute to support their health and life goals. This also aligns with previous findings that Kwak et al (2018) Primary data: session notes written by interventionists. Supplementary data: interviews with participants and weekly team meeting notes Cultural themes identified: (1) dealing with negative memories in early years of marriage;…”

“…The sample sizes ranged from 1 (the case studies) to 56 (multiple case study; Kwak et al ., 2018). For the controlled trials, the average sample size was 20 (with a range from 5 to 31).…”

“…Seven studies focused on the first aim, three on the second aim, and four had a combination of both aims. Kwak et al (2018) Hence, there were 11 studies with the first aim and seven with the second aim in total.…”

The Importance of Attention to Cultural Factors in the Approach to Dementia Care Services for Older Persons

“…The Couples Life Story Approach is a narrative intervention approach to help couples communicate and navigate their dementia experience (Ingersoll-Dayton et al, 2013). Kwak, Ha, Hwang, Ingersoll-Dayton, and Spencer (2017) explore a cultural adaptation of this dyadic intervention with Korean couples, using the Cultural Adaptation Process Model. Cultural themes and issues emerging from the research includedealing with negative memories and difficult life events, and identifying and facilitating different communication styles and patterns.…”

Exploring life story books in dementia care: the potential of digital reminiscence interventions

“…The sample sizes ranged from 1 (the case studies) to 56 (multiple case study; Kwak et al, 2018). For the controlled trials, the average sample size was 20 (with a range from 5 to 31).…”