2014
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural adaptation and intervention integrity: a response to Skarstrand, Sundell and Andreasson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an adapted version of the US-based Strengthening Families Program demonstrated no effect when introduced to Sweden 10. While attributed to differences between contexts, commentators argued that local adaptations had gone so far as to violate the intervention’s causal logic 11. New guidance is required to respond to these complexities and provide comprehensive and systematic decision-making tools.…”
Section: The Need For Guidance On Adapting Population Health Intervenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an adapted version of the US-based Strengthening Families Program demonstrated no effect when introduced to Sweden 10. While attributed to differences between contexts, commentators argued that local adaptations had gone so far as to violate the intervention’s causal logic 11. New guidance is required to respond to these complexities and provide comprehensive and systematic decision-making tools.…”
Section: The Need For Guidance On Adapting Population Health Intervenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis agrees with the recommendations of the SFP 10-14 authors, who discourage the following: making changes to the order, general structure, or duration; implementing omissions, combinations, or lesson theme changes; and reorganizing or removing homework or content from sessions, as such actions could reduce the program's effectiveness . Other researchers also raised this issue and stated that the changes made in the adaptation process in Sweden resulted in a new intervention, recommending that an assessment should be made concerning the extent to which such modifications fit with existing program theories of change and logic models (Segrott et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tension between fidelity and adaptation is a recurring issue in implementation science (Aarons et al 2017;Parker et al 2019;Barrera Jr. et al 2017;Movsisyan et al 2019). In order to avoid compromising fidelity during the adaptation process, the core components of the program must be preserved (LoBraico et al 2019;Segrott et al 2014), in contrast to its discretionary components, which can be adjusted without departing from the intervention's underlying theory. The intervention's core components should be specified in its theory, which predicts certain relationships between the intervention and its outcomes (Movsisyan et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma questão largamente debatida nas pesquisas na área da adaptação cultural de intervenções diz respeito ao dilema entre manter a fidelidade à intervenção original e adaptá-la às características da população--alvo. A preservação da fidelidade durante o processo de adaptação cultural requer que a implementação da intervenção mantenha os seus componentes centrais e atividades e processos ligados aos resultados esperados (Segrott et al, 2013).…”
Section: Adaptação Cultural E Fidelidadeunclassified