2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00822.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultivation‐independent in situ molecular analysis of bacteria involved in degradation of pentachlorophenol in soil

Abstract: The central aim of this study was to determine which components of an indigenous bacterial community in pristine grassland soil were capable of degrading pentachlorophenol (PCP) using two cultivation-independent, in situ, molecular techniques. The first involved polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification of 16S rRNA genes from DNA and RNA, respectively, extracted from PCP-amended soil. The second involved stable isotope probing (SIP), with incubat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA was eluted in sterile water at 65 1C for 30 min and used as a template for PCR amplification under the conditions mentioned above. In most cases as reported by Mahmood et al (2005), further rounds of band excision, PCR amplification and DGGE analysis were necessary before sequencing the PCR products (Genome express, Meylan, France). A particular attention was paid on 13 Clabelled populations and those impacted by glucosinolates, specifically in case of minor DGGE bands.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was eluted in sterile water at 65 1C for 30 min and used as a template for PCR amplification under the conditions mentioned above. In most cases as reported by Mahmood et al (2005), further rounds of band excision, PCR amplification and DGGE analysis were necessary before sequencing the PCR products (Genome express, Meylan, France). A particular attention was paid on 13 Clabelled populations and those impacted by glucosinolates, specifically in case of minor DGGE bands.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, DNA-based fingerprints are assumed to reflect the taxa present in a community, whereas RNA-based fingerprints reflect the active members of the community (Logue and Lindström, 2010;Prosser et al, 2010). A seminal experimental study combining nucleic acid-based fingerprints with stable isotope probing by Mahmood et al (2005) showed the validity of this concept by finding that six out of seven major RNA-based phylotypes in soil microcosms were actively degrading pentachlorophenol. This led us to the assumption that a comparison of RNA-based community fingerprints of bacterioplankton with DNA-based fingerprints from the same samples could provide criteria to identify the active members of the core community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIP involves the incorporation of 13 C-label into cellular biomarkers such as nucleic acids, followed by density gradient separation of labeled nucleic acids and molecular identification of the involved microbes (Radajewski et al, 2000). Today, the SIP technique has greatly increased our understanding of the role of specific microbial community members in diverse environmental settings (Madsen, 2006) and identified key microbes utilizing various aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons (Manefield et al, 2002;Jeon et al, 2003;Padmanabhan et al, 2003;Mahmood et al, 2005;Yu and Chu, 2005;Kasai et al, 2006). The goal of the present study was to identify the microorganisms in our enrichment specifically responsible for anaerobic benzene degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%