2017
DOI: 10.18617/liinc.v13i1.3900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultivating sustainable developments with makerspaces | Cultivando desenvolvimento sustentável com espaços maker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, it is clear that the strengths of maker organisations like [Anon] come from their responsiveness to local needs, and their embeddedness in communities to not only develop new artefacts and systems, but to also account for the skills, expertise and social infrastructures that surround these. As noted by [37], rather than seeing the products of spaces like [Anon] as being immediately transferable across contexts and transnational boundaries, we suggest instead further inquiry into the ways place-specific maker endeavours may transfer instead. As with the work that [Anon] has conducted, this does not mean simply transferring the tools typically associated with makerspaces from one locale to another, but to embed a mode of enquiry where discarded objects are prised open, taken apart, remade, and the tools, practices and skills are themselves created with respect to the local communities the space serves.…”
Section: Making At the Marginsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At the same time, it is clear that the strengths of maker organisations like [Anon] come from their responsiveness to local needs, and their embeddedness in communities to not only develop new artefacts and systems, but to also account for the skills, expertise and social infrastructures that surround these. As noted by [37], rather than seeing the products of spaces like [Anon] as being immediately transferable across contexts and transnational boundaries, we suggest instead further inquiry into the ways place-specific maker endeavours may transfer instead. As with the work that [Anon] has conducted, this does not mean simply transferring the tools typically associated with makerspaces from one locale to another, but to embed a mode of enquiry where discarded objects are prised open, taken apart, remade, and the tools, practices and skills are themselves created with respect to the local communities the space serves.…”
Section: Making At the Marginsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Open workshops are often framed as guided by a more or less explicit set of progressive values, encompassing social sustainability and justice, in addition to enhancing wellbeing (Holmes, 2018), where alternatives to mass production, consumerism and global capitalism come to fruition (Collins, 2018;Kohtala, 2017;Luckman, 2018;Smith, 2020;Smith & Light, 2017). Indeed, often such spaces have been read for difference, following the diverse economy lens proposed by Gibson-Graham (2008); Smith & Light, 2017;Vincent, 2022). Such a lens has been applied to explore every day and beyond-economic practices occurring in open workshops that align with volunteer work, as well as adaptive strategies that promote gratitude, solidarity, and trust (Schmid & Smith, 2021).…”
Section: Makerspaces Sustainability Transitions and Progressive Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Smith and Light (2017), hackerspaces contribute in a concrete manner to the circulation of technical and technological knowledge throughout different spaces and sectors of society. They must be seen as Movimento hackerspace: um estudo sobre a experiência brasileira Resumo: Os hackerspaces fazem parte de fenômeno emergente em todo o mundo de construção de espaços e infraestruturas alternativos de pesquisa, experimentação e aprendizado.…”
Section: Final Considerationsunclassified