2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultivar specific metabolic changes in grapevines berry skins in relation to deficit irrigation and hydraulic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies in grapevine showed that hydraulic conductivity of leaves (K leaf ) and of stem (K stem ) contributes to variation among varieties regarding their response to soil water deficit and the recovery response to drought (Schultz and Stoll, 2010;Coupel-Ledru et al, 2014;Hochberg et al, 2015;Martorell et al, 2015). The observed intra-specific variation in K leaf can reflect differences in leaf morpho-anatomy (Nardini et al, 2012) and in water pathways through the outside xylem to the water evaporation sites.…”
Section: Morpho-hydraulics and Water Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in grapevine showed that hydraulic conductivity of leaves (K leaf ) and of stem (K stem ) contributes to variation among varieties regarding their response to soil water deficit and the recovery response to drought (Schultz and Stoll, 2010;Coupel-Ledru et al, 2014;Hochberg et al, 2015;Martorell et al, 2015). The observed intra-specific variation in K leaf can reflect differences in leaf morpho-anatomy (Nardini et al, 2012) and in water pathways through the outside xylem to the water evaporation sites.…”
Section: Morpho-hydraulics and Water Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the most accurate way of monitoring DI is by measuring relevant physiological variables (Cifre et al, 2005), acquiring these preliminary indicators of stress might also entail intrusive equipment and proficient manpower. Furthermore, as spatial variability (Bramley, 2005;Trought and Bramley, 2011) and genotype-based hydraulic differences (Hochberg et al, 2015) within a vineyard may also require numerous samplings, physiology tools become also time-and cost-inefficient (Hall et al, 2002). Therefore, a faster, simpler, cheaper and non-destructive alternative is necessary to advance DI regulation in grapevine (Cifre et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to conversion of the total aminoacids into the most convenient form of amino acid such as proline or any other compatible solute. Hochberg et al, (2015) observed a similar response in grapevines subjected to water deficits; a decrease in aminoacids with corresponding increase of metabolites such as proline, beta alanine, ascorbate. A corresponding increase in proline content of N 22 suggests that the amino acids are depleted to facilitate an increase in proline.…”
Section: Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A disturbance in the amino acid concentrations is generally observed under stress conditions (Hochberg et al, 2015). After 6hrs of stress period, the amino acid concentration in TH was almost same as its control, but doubled its amino acid levels within 24hrs and during recovery its amino acid levels dropped back to normal as in the control.…”
Section: Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 92%