2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.87.129603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cugliandolo and Iguain Reply:

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
123
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have obtained the following consequences : (i) in the linear response regime, the Fluctuation-Dissipation Relation or Einstein relation (26) is valid even in the aging time sector; (ii) for a fixed waiting time t w and fixed external field f , the validity of the linear response regime is limited in the time (t − t w ) by the characteristic time t µ (f ) ∼ (βf ) The results (i) and (ii) are in full agreement with the scaling analysis and the numerical simulations presented in [33], and we hope that our approach in some sense "explains" why aging trap models, which are known to present strong localization effects and to be completely out-of-equilibrium (see for instance the effective dynamics described in [32]), nevertheless satisfies the Fluctuation-Dissipation Relation in the whole linear response regime, in contrast with many disordered systems which present a non-trivial violation in the linear response regime [5,6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have obtained the following consequences : (i) in the linear response regime, the Fluctuation-Dissipation Relation or Einstein relation (26) is valid even in the aging time sector; (ii) for a fixed waiting time t w and fixed external field f , the validity of the linear response regime is limited in the time (t − t w ) by the characteristic time t µ (f ) ∼ (βf ) The results (i) and (ii) are in full agreement with the scaling analysis and the numerical simulations presented in [33], and we hope that our approach in some sense "explains" why aging trap models, which are known to present strong localization effects and to be completely out-of-equilibrium (see for instance the effective dynamics described in [32]), nevertheless satisfies the Fluctuation-Dissipation Relation in the whole linear response regime, in contrast with many disordered systems which present a non-trivial violation in the linear response regime [5,6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where the distribution of the energies E n presents the exponential tail (6) to mimic the lowest energies statistics found in the Random Energy Model [37] and the distribution of free energy of states in the replica theory of spin-glasses [38]. This choice is moreover reinforced [39] by the exponential tail of the Gumbel distribution which represents one universality classes of extreme-value statistics.…”
Section: Law For the Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations