1977
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuffed endotracheal tubes: Mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, prophylactic strategies for decreasing sore throat frequency and severity are still recommended. It's self-evident that the complication primarily resulted from the irritation of tracheal mucosal receptors (23,24), which might lead to further local inflammation or/and edema (25). Therefore, blocking these receptors with local anesthetics, such as lidocaine, should be an effective option for preventing ETT-induced sore throat, as demonstrated by previous studies (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, prophylactic strategies for decreasing sore throat frequency and severity are still recommended. It's self-evident that the complication primarily resulted from the irritation of tracheal mucosal receptors (23,24), which might lead to further local inflammation or/and edema (25). Therefore, blocking these receptors with local anesthetics, such as lidocaine, should be an effective option for preventing ETT-induced sore throat, as demonstrated by previous studies (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the pressure exerted on the tracheal wall by endotracheal tube cuffs has been estimated using calculations from balloons interposed between cuff and trachea, implantable transducers cuff, gas flowing across the cuff-trachea contact area through hollow sleeves and compliance curves [15][16][17][18]. There are common methodological problems with each technique, which may be categorised under the headings measuring probe error, pressure measurement volume displacement error and volume aliquot inflation error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Third, our data for cadaveric laryngopharyngeal mucosal pressures closely match those of two previous studies of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paralyzed anesthetized patients. 11,12 Fourth, cadavers have been used to determine the risk of esophageal rupture, 14 liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx, 15 pharyngeal and tracheal mucosal pressure 16 and cervical motion studies. 17 Our study was conducted in cadavers and awake volunteers since we considered it unethical to inflate the LTA to the maximum recommended volumes in patients due to the potential for trauma.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%