2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cues and cue interactions in segmenting words in fluent speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty with V-less contexts first discovered in British English is quite general: It appears also in American English (Newman et al 2011), Dutch (McQueen & Cutler 1998, German (Hanuliková et al 2011), French (Dumay et al 2002, using a slightly different task), Japanese (McQueen et al 2001), and Cantonese (Yip 2004a,b; again with an adapted task). It could also be determined that it was the presence of a V, rather than syllabic legality, which enables contexts to support word segmentation.…”
Section: Segmenting Real Words From Minimal Contextsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The difficulty with V-less contexts first discovered in British English is quite general: It appears also in American English (Newman et al 2011), Dutch (McQueen & Cutler 1998, German (Hanuliková et al 2011), French (Dumay et al 2002, using a slightly different task), Japanese (McQueen et al 2001), and Cantonese (Yip 2004a,b; again with an adapted task). It could also be determined that it was the presence of a V, rather than syllabic legality, which enables contexts to support word segmentation.…”
Section: Segmenting Real Words From Minimal Contextsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, one possible interpretation of the present results is that lexical access proceeds in such a way as to avoid stranding illegal nonword sequences, and that this led listeners to instead incorporate speech across voices. Prior research has generally found otherwise, however; although listeners avoid parsing in ways that strand items that are impossible as a word (such as a single consonant; Norris, McQueen, Cutler, & Butterfield, 1997), they do not avoid parsing in ways that strand items that are simply not known as words or are unlikely to be words (Newman, Sawusch, & Wunnenberg, 2011), as was the case here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This fact allows the PWC to benefit processing in most languages. The PWC has been demonstrated with various tasks in English (Newman, Sawusch, & Wunnenberg, 2011;Norris, McQueen, Cutler, Butterfield, & Kearns, 2001;Norris et al, 1997), Cantonese (Yip, 2004), Sesotho (Cutler, Demuth, et al, 2002), Dutch (McQueen & Cutler, 1998Vroomen & De Gelder, 1997), German (Hanulíková et al, 2011), French (Dumay et al, 2002;Spinelli, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003) and Japanese (McQueen, Otake, & Cutler, 2001). It affects word-form recognition by prelinguistic infants (Johnson, Jusczyk, Cutler, & Norris, 2003), and a PWC-like lexical viability constraint controls segmentation in British Sign Language (Orfanidou, Adam, Morgan, & McQueen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%