PsycEXTRA Dataset 2007
DOI: 10.1037/e512682013-329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cue Validitity Effects in Response Preparation: A Pupillometric Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the P3 oddball effect requires engagement in the task, all studies on the relationship between the pupillary response and P3 have used active paradigms, meaning that participants respond to stimuli and that these responses are systematically confounded with condition (either only one or a different button press for oddball targets). Thus, increased pupil size for oddballs compared to standards at the later stages of the epoch as observed here might have been caused by an additional effect of increased response preparation for the oddball or inhibition of the standard response (Hupé et al, 2009;Moresi et al, 2008). There was an effect of oddballs not just on the pupil but also on response (preparation) in that reaction times were P600 AND P3 ARE LINKED TO THE PUPILLARY RESPONSE 30 longer for oddballs than standards.…”
Section: P600 and P3 Are Linked To The Pupillary Response 28 4 Discus...mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Since the P3 oddball effect requires engagement in the task, all studies on the relationship between the pupillary response and P3 have used active paradigms, meaning that participants respond to stimuli and that these responses are systematically confounded with condition (either only one or a different button press for oddball targets). Thus, increased pupil size for oddballs compared to standards at the later stages of the epoch as observed here might have been caused by an additional effect of increased response preparation for the oddball or inhibition of the standard response (Hupé et al, 2009;Moresi et al, 2008). There was an effect of oddballs not just on the pupil but also on response (preparation) in that reaction times were P600 AND P3 ARE LINKED TO THE PUPILLARY RESPONSE 30 longer for oddballs than standards.…”
Section: P600 and P3 Are Linked To The Pupillary Response 28 4 Discus...mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This is supported by a lack of the PDR in response to standard sounds in studies presenting a very similar sound sequence as in the present study but participants watched a video clip and did not perform a categorization task (Bonmassar et al, 2020). In addition, repercussions of the motor responses' preparation to the target, may have influenced the dilation of the pupil to standard sounds as well and this would also explain the absence of a correlation between distraction effects and PDR specific for sound type on a trial level (see examples for the influence of motor response and response preparation on pupil dilation, McCloy et al, 2016;Moresi et al, 2008;Simpson, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%