2000
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cue-Induced Cocaine Craving: Neuroanatomical Specificity for Drug Users and Drug Stimuli

Abstract: Objective: Cocaine-related cues have been hypothesized to perpetuate drug abuse by inducing a craving response that prompts drug-seeking behavior. However, the mechanisms, underlying neuroanatomy, and specificity of this neuroanatomy are not yet fully understood.Method: To address these issues, experienced cocaine users (N=17) and comparison subjects (N=14) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing three separate films that portrayed 1 ) individuals smoking crack cocaine, 2) outdoor nature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

68
619
5
14

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 841 publications
(706 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(41 reference statements)
68
619
5
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Research suggests that cue-related cocaine craving involves the activation of a network of cortical regions involved in the engagement of attention, and the subsequent ruminations also involve the fronto-parietal network seen in WM rehearsal (Childress et al, 1999;Garavan et al, 2000;Grant et al, 1996;Kilts et al, 2001;Maas et al, 1998). Although speculative, a link between WM demands, cocaine craving and poor error awareness may help explain why cocaine users selfmonitoring, or insight into their own behavior, is particularly poor during craving for the drug (Miller and Gold, 1994).…”
Section: Error Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that cue-related cocaine craving involves the activation of a network of cortical regions involved in the engagement of attention, and the subsequent ruminations also involve the fronto-parietal network seen in WM rehearsal (Childress et al, 1999;Garavan et al, 2000;Grant et al, 1996;Kilts et al, 2001;Maas et al, 1998). Although speculative, a link between WM demands, cocaine craving and poor error awareness may help explain why cocaine users selfmonitoring, or insight into their own behavior, is particularly poor during craving for the drug (Miller and Gold, 1994).…”
Section: Error Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difficulty exerting high levels of topdown control might also account for clinical symptoms such as ruminative thoughts. For example, studies with cocaine users suggest that cue-induced ruminative thoughts activate a 'WM-like' network of regions (Bonson et al, 2002;Garavan et al, 2000), and impaired performance on a central executive or WM task has been associated with rumination induction in a sample of patients suffering from major depression (Watkins and Brown, 2002). If ruminative thoughts represent the temporary processing of items in WM, the current research suggests that as these WM demands increase it will take a high level of top-down control to inhibit the attention directed towards them, a capacity showing impairment in both of these groups (Bolla et al, 2000;Tekin and Cummings, 2002).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, these abnormalities in PFC activity appear to be common across various drug addictions (incl. cocaine, methamphetamine, alcohol, cannabis, heroin and dissociative anesthetics), as well as across such non-drug addictions as gambling, and correlate with self-reports of "craving" and impairments in self-control in addicted individuals [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[1][2][3][4]. The vast number of clinical neuroimaging studies conducted on addicted individuals reveal striking abnormalities in prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity, relative to control subjects, that include reduced basal metabolic activity, reduced regional activation upon presentation of cues associated with non-drug primary reinforcers and enhanced metabolic activity upon presentation of drug-associated cues [e.g., [5][6][7][8][9]. Importantly, these abnormalities in PFC activity appear to be common across various drug addictions (incl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%