2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.918429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CUDA-MPI-FDTD implementation of Maxwell's equations in general dispersive media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also need to note that in these simulations, minimum data transfer between the device and the host was required. However, the above speedup factors could be reduced drastically for applications involving large amount of data transfer as discussed in [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also need to note that in these simulations, minimum data transfer between the device and the host was required. However, the above speedup factors could be reduced drastically for applications involving large amount of data transfer as discussed in [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model them accurately, different dispersive models have been incorporated into Maxwell equations [13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Most of the available dispersive models are in frequency domain, so as to make them consistent with time domain methods different approaches such as recursive convolution (RC), piecewise linear recursive convolution (PLRC), z-transform and auxiliary differential equation (ADE) [13,18,[24][25][26] are used.…”
Section: Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, GPU-accelerated FDTD method has been applied to different applications. In [16], the two-dimensional FDTD method is implemented on GPU for dispersive media using single pole Debye model with piecewise linear recursive convolution (PLRC) method for microwave applications. In [17], the threedimensional FDTD method is implemented on GPU for low and mid frequency acoustics applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different approaches, such as using clusters [22] or field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) [23], using graphics processing unit (GPU) is more efficient, and cheaper in reducing runtimes. In spite of large efforts on GPU parallel programming for ordinary FDTD [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], GPU parallel programming for SF-FDTD has not been reported yet, to the best of our knowledge. Even though cluster programming by using Massage Passing Interface (MPI) has been reported for SF-FDTD [32,33], it has not achieved good efficiency, compared to the GPU implementation reported here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%