1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80466-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubital tunnel release with medial epicondylectomy factors influencing the outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the literature, the electrodiagnostic results did not predict post-surgical outcomes [Seradge and Owen, 1998;Novak et al, 2002]. The interpretation of this finding should take into consideration the variable sensitivity [Britz et al, 1996;Landau et al, 2003] of these tests especially in the early stages of UNE when symptoms tend to be intermittent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Consistent with the literature, the electrodiagnostic results did not predict post-surgical outcomes [Seradge and Owen, 1998;Novak et al, 2002]. The interpretation of this finding should take into consideration the variable sensitivity [Britz et al, 1996;Landau et al, 2003] of these tests especially in the early stages of UNE when symptoms tend to be intermittent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For partial epicondylectomy, improvement percentages have been reported as 67% good to excellent results in 27 patients [21], 75% good to excellent results in 60 patients [30], 75% good to excellent results in 55 patients [37], 79% good to excellent results in 80 patients [8], and 80% good to excellent results in 45 patients [28]. Several studies have shown that after total epicondylectomy, patients experienced an overall subjective improvement of approximately 90% [9,14,16,25,40]. In studies of anterior transposition of ulnar nerve in patients with severe-stage cubital tunnel syndrome, the improvement percentages were reported as 72% to 100% [12,13,15,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the controversy of the operative procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome is the method by which to release the ligament but most surgeons would agree that successful management of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome depends on complete release of the flexor retinaculum [1,3,6,17,22]. In contrast for cubital tunnel syndrome, there are numerous operative procedures that have been described for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome ranging from simple decompression, medial epicondylectomy to transposition of the ulnar nerve [2,4,7,9,12,13,14,15,16,19,21,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31]. These procedures vary not only in surgical technique but also in the correction of the etiologic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous operative procedures described for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome ranging from simple decompression, medial epicondylectomy to transposition of the ulnar nerve [2,4,7,9,12,13,14,15,16,19,21,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31]. With each operative procedure, there have been reports of excellent patient outcome as well as postoperative complications [10,11,18,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%