Based on Welge's solution of the flow equation, a method (JBN technique) to calculate the individual phase relative permeabilities from displacement data was developed for the first time in 1959. It's the most commonly used data reduction method for obtaining relative permeability relationships from unsteady state data. Similar to the Welge method, differentiation of data is required and negligible capillary end effects are assumed when using the JBN method. To apply the JBN method, information on pore volumes of fluids injected and produced, the pressure drop across the porous medium and fluid viscosities is needed. This method generally gives relative permeabilities over a fairly small saturation range, which varies depending on the relative mobilities of the flowing fluids. In order to improve the results of this method, many researchers have come up with different techniques in their JBN analysis including the cubic spline numerical modeling technique (CSNMT) discussed in this research. This paper presents relative permeability data obtained from comparative analysis of the JBN method with different approaches. The differentials of second order Lagrange interpolating polynomial and cubic spline numerical modeling technique (CSNMT) were all considered in the JBN analysis. The relative permeability curves were then analyzed and the best method was chosen. The results of all the different methods employed in the JBN analysis do not match perfectly throughout the entire saturation range. The errors in the use of the differentials of second order Lagrange interpolating polynomial on more than three data point are very substantial. The results obtained from the application of cubic splines are more representative of the relative permeabilities from the field cores.