2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubic phase function: A simple solution to polynomial phase signal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Known from equation 22, γK 2 11 ≈ γ/c 2 ≪ 1, so the phase term exp jπγK 2 11 t 4 m can be negligible, and therefore, the echo can be regarded as a cubic phase function with respect to t m [21]. The cubic phase function (CPF) [22] can be used to estimate the third-order phase coefficient η 1 and the second-order coefficient η 2 . With them, the phase compensation function can be constructed as S cmp t m = exp jπ η 1 t 3 m + η 2 t 2 m , and after Doppler compensation, the echo is…”
Section: B-isar Range-doppler Imaging Analysis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Known from equation 22, γK 2 11 ≈ γ/c 2 ≪ 1, so the phase term exp jπγK 2 11 t 4 m can be negligible, and therefore, the echo can be regarded as a cubic phase function with respect to t m [21]. The cubic phase function (CPF) [22] can be used to estimate the third-order phase coefficient η 1 and the second-order coefficient η 2 . With them, the phase compensation function can be constructed as S cmp t m = exp jπ η 1 t 3 m + η 2 t 2 m , and after Doppler compensation, the echo is…”
Section: B-isar Range-doppler Imaging Analysis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the method proposed in Section 4 and the method proposed in [12] is the introduction of speed compensation and Doppler compensation, and the cost time of these two parts can be calculated according to [20][21][22]. However, the computation complexity of the sparse imaging step is the same as the method in [12].…”
Section: Verification Of the Parameter Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many modified methods have been proposed to reduce the cross terms, such as the product forms of HAF (PAHF) [9] and CPF (PCPF) [10], these methods are also influenced by the cross terms of the mc-PPS, especially when numerous components are contained and the intensities of every component are similar. The PPT methods are reviewed in detail in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the number of signal components is increased with more resolvable scattering elements, while the component extraction is more difficult and easily interfered with by noises as the energy of each single component reduces relatively. On the other hand, more complex changes in target gesture lead to higher orders in the echo phase and inconsistant methods can reduce the phase order by certain processes and reduce the search space to one dimension, which is reviewed in detail in the cited paper [17]. The DPT and classical HAF methods allow each order parameter of a PPS to be obtained by searching the maximum after Fourier transform of its PD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%