2018
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubic halo bias in Eulerian and Lagrangian space

Abstract: Predictions of the next-to-leading order, i.e. one-loop, halo power spectra, depend on local and non-local bias parameters up to cubic order. The linear bias parameter can be estimated from the large scale limit of the halo-matter power spectrum, and the second order bias parameters from the large scale, tree-level bispectrum. Cubic operators would naturally be quantified using the tree-level trispectrum. As the latter is computationally expensive, we extend the quadratic field method proposed in Schmittfull e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
127
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
25
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the scale R * is larger than the spatial length scale (nonlinear scale) controlling the perturbative expansion, then one can correspondingly include higher-order derivative terms. This might be the case for very massive halos [66][67][68], for example, or due to radiative-transfer effects [69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Higher Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the scale R * is larger than the spatial length scale (nonlinear scale) controlling the perturbative expansion, then one can correspondingly include higher-order derivative terms. This might be the case for very massive halos [66][67][68], for example, or due to radiative-transfer effects [69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Higher Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall use the 'natural' smoothing of our simulation grids (0.75 h −1 Mpc), and comment upon this later (see also Aviles 2018). Going to higher order in the bias expansion requires the addition of many more terms, with cubic order already doubling the number of coefficients (Lazeyras & Schmidt 2018;Abidi & Baldauf 2018).…”
Section: The Bias Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While values of the derivative bias b∇ will be sensitive to small-scale details such as smoothing and are therefore not expected to be universal, an extensive literature exists studying physical models for b1, b2, bs (see §1 for references). To this end, we have checked that enforcing, to within a few per cent, the peak-background split relations between (b1, b2) from Sheth & Tormen (1999) (keeping ν as a free parameter) and values of bs from Abidi & Baldauf (2018) only degrades our fits at the few (∼ 3) per cent level in P hh and P hm and doesn't significantly alter the range of fit.…”
Section: Fitting Halo Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of these operators is controlled by the corresponding non-linear bias coefficients. One could try to derive bias parameters analytically or extract them from N-body simulations [33][34][35][36]. In this work we adopt an agnostic approach for the bias expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%