2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubic approximation to Sturmian continued fractions

Abstract: We determine the classical exponents of approximation w 3 (ζ), w * 3 (ζ), λ 3 (ζ) and w 3 (ζ), w * 3 (ζ), λ 3 (ζ) associated to real numbers ζ whose continued fraction expansions are given by a Sturmian word. We more generally provide a description of the combined graph of the parametric successive minima functions defined by Schmidt and Summerer in dimension three for such Sturmian continued fractions. This both complements similar results due to Bugeaud and Laurent concerning the two-dimensional exponents an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore any Sturmian continued fraction defined as in [11] also provides a counterexample for certain indices. Indeed, for these numbers we have both w =2 (ζ) > w =3 (ζ) and w =2 (ζ) > w =3 (ζ), as follows from the results in [39]. See also [38,…”
Section: Classical and New Exponentssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore any Sturmian continued fraction defined as in [11] also provides a counterexample for certain indices. Indeed, for these numbers we have both w =2 (ζ) > w =3 (ζ) and w =2 (ζ) > w =3 (ζ), as follows from the results in [39]. See also [38,…”
Section: Classical and New Exponentssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To conclude it suffices to note that for each 0 < l < s k+1 , we have y ψ(t k +l) = y t k +l−1 = w l k y ψ(t k ) . Also note that (4.4) is equivalent to (19) of [5]. We find the first relation of (4.6) by using (4.4) together with the definition of z t k +l+1 and z t k +l .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…(one may compare this estimate with (19) of [14]). Indeed, by (3.2), by multiplicative growth and with c 1 , c 2 > 0 denoting the constants of (5.1), we have…”
Section: Construction Of Sturmian Type Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bound appears to be optimal, extremal numbers ξ defined by Roy [20] satisfy [23]. Similar results apply for every Sturmian continued fraction [24]. Theorem 1.3 was known for n = 2 in view of ( 5) and (9).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%