2018
DOI: 10.4064/aa8655-5-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubes in products of terms from an arithmetic progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All solutions of Equation () with Kk=2$K-k=2$, k4$k \geqslant 4$, 3$\ell \geqslant 3$ have been given in [55] and [68]. For papers with Kk2,b=0$K-k \geqslant 2, b_{\ell }=0$ see [3] and [22]. Hajdu, Papp and Tijdeman [41] provided effective upper bounds for maxfalse(false|xfalse|,false|yfalse|,false)$\max (|x|,|y|,\ell )$ in () under the assumption that Kk<cK2/3$K-k &lt; cK^{2/3}$ for some explicit c>0$c&gt;0$.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All solutions of Equation () with Kk=2$K-k=2$, k4$k \geqslant 4$, 3$\ell \geqslant 3$ have been given in [55] and [68]. For papers with Kk2,b=0$K-k \geqslant 2, b_{\ell }=0$ see [3] and [22]. Hajdu, Papp and Tijdeman [41] provided effective upper bounds for maxfalse(false|xfalse|,false|yfalse|,false)$\max (|x|,|y|,\ell )$ in () under the assumption that Kk<cK2/3$K-k &lt; cK^{2/3}$ for some explicit c>0$c&gt;0$.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All solutions of Equation ( 5) with 𝐾 − 𝑘 = 2, 𝑘 ⩾ 4, 𝓁 ⩾ 3 have been given in [55] and [68]. For papers with 𝐾 − 𝑘 ⩾ 2, 𝑏 𝓁 = 0 see [3] and [22]. Hajdu, Papp and Tijdeman [41] provided effective upper bounds for max(|𝑥|, |𝑦|, 𝓁) in ( 5) under the assumption that 𝐾 − 𝑘 < 𝑐𝐾 2∕3 for some explicit 𝑐 > 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukhopadhyay and Shorey [53] for ℓ = 2 and Saradha and Shorey [66] for ℓ ≥ 3 determined all solutions of equation ( 5) with [3] and [20]. Hajdu, Papp and Tijdeman [39] provided effective upper bounds for max(|x|, |y|, ℓ) in ( 5) under the assumption that K − k < cK 2/3 for some explicit c > 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have 4b 3 = 4 • 5 3 = 4 2 + 22 2 = 10 2 +20 2 . Taking (w 1 , w 2 ) = (4, 22),(10,20), by(24), we get (w 3 , w 4 ) = (−4, −22), (−10, −20), and by(26), u = −23506, 8750, respectively. That is, we haveD 4 (x, 5 3 ) = (x + 4)(x − 4)(x + 22)(x − 22) + 23506 = = (x + 10)(x − 10)(x + 20)(x − 20) − 8750.Since, by(32), the equation F (x) := D 4 (x, 5 3 ) = D 3 (y, 5 4 ) =: G(y) has infinitely many integral solutions (x, y) = (D 3 (X, 5), D 4 (X, 5)) (X ∈ Z), we obtain that the equationf (x) := (x+4)(x−4)(x+22)(x−22)(x+10)(x−10)(x+20)(x−20) = = (D 3 (y, 5 4 ) − 23506)(D 3 (y, 5 4 ) + 8750) =: g(y) has the same solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%