2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CuAl2O4–CuO–Al2O3 catalysts prepared by flame-spray pyrolysis for glycerol hydrogenolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was due to the coking and metal sintering probably arising from the pyrolysis preparation technique as well as operating reaction conditions of higher temperature. 89 The activity testing of the 60% Cu/Al 2 O 3 in a continuous down-flow fixed bed reactor shows that an increase in catalyst size from 0.1-0.16 (in a batch reactor) to 1.6-2.5 (in a continuous reactor) transfers the process to an intermediate mode between kinetic and inter diffusion-controlled reaction regime. Over the same catalysts, the optimized reaction conditions for glycerol hydrogenolysis in a fixed bed reactor are temperature ≤250 °C, 50 bar H 2 , superficial liquid velocity 0.55 (m 3 m −2 h −1 ) giving 1,2-PDO selectivity of 91.5% with glycerol conversion of 80-95%.…”
Section: Supported Cu Based Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to the coking and metal sintering probably arising from the pyrolysis preparation technique as well as operating reaction conditions of higher temperature. 89 The activity testing of the 60% Cu/Al 2 O 3 in a continuous down-flow fixed bed reactor shows that an increase in catalyst size from 0.1-0.16 (in a batch reactor) to 1.6-2.5 (in a continuous reactor) transfers the process to an intermediate mode between kinetic and inter diffusion-controlled reaction regime. Over the same catalysts, the optimized reaction conditions for glycerol hydrogenolysis in a fixed bed reactor are temperature ≤250 °C, 50 bar H 2 , superficial liquid velocity 0.55 (m 3 m −2 h −1 ) giving 1,2-PDO selectivity of 91.5% with glycerol conversion of 80-95%.…”
Section: Supported Cu Based Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher selectivity to 1,2-PDO (∼83%) was also observed over a Cu-ZnO catalyst owing to acidity incorporated by ZnO and small Cu particle size; however, the catalyst was not active, and glycerol conversion was limited to only ∼22% . The CuO-CuAl 2 O 4 -Al 2 O 3 mixed phase catalyst prepared by flame-spray pyrolysis results 55.5% conversion and 50.9% yield to 1,2-PDO at 5 MPa H 2 and 220 °C due to synergy among the different phases …”
Section: Classification and Overview Of Catalysts Developed For Liqui...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Al sites and the copper sites present on hydroxylated alumina showed similar affinity toward the adsorption of glycerol and acetol, respectively. Al sites revealed a lower energy barrier for the cleavage of the O–H bond of glycerol with respect to the Cu site …”
Section: Classification and Overview Of Catalysts Developed For Liqui...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Glycerol dehydration is influenced by the reaction time. Since the dehydration of glycerol is a multi-step cascade reaction that takes time to complete, longer reaction times appear to produce higher product yields [172][173][174]. On the other hand, reaction pressure has a great effect on glycerol dehydration.…”
Section: Some Special Process Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%