2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu2ZnSnS4 films grown in one-step process by spray pyrolysis with improved properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical absorbance spectra increased with annealing temperature increased, the values of optical absorbance in the wavelength 475 nm are 1.34, 1.56 and 1.80 for the CNTS films deposited at 4, 5 and 6 cycles respectively, these values motived the future research on CNTS thin films as alternative absorbers materials for solar cells applications. These results are comparable to the reported Ramírez et al for sprayed Cu 2 ZnSnS 4[36], also, Ghediya et al for CCTS absorber materials deposited by dip-coating technique[37] and Elsaeedy for CNTS absorber layers deposited by spray pyrolysis method[14].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The optical absorbance spectra increased with annealing temperature increased, the values of optical absorbance in the wavelength 475 nm are 1.34, 1.56 and 1.80 for the CNTS films deposited at 4, 5 and 6 cycles respectively, these values motived the future research on CNTS thin films as alternative absorbers materials for solar cells applications. These results are comparable to the reported Ramírez et al for sprayed Cu 2 ZnSnS 4[36], also, Ghediya et al for CCTS absorber materials deposited by dip-coating technique[37] and Elsaeedy for CNTS absorber layers deposited by spray pyrolysis method[14].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…deposited at 4, 5 and 6 cycles respectively, these values motived the future research on CNTS thin films as alternative absorbers materials for solar cells applications. These results are comparable to the reported Ramírez et al for sprayed Cu 2 ZnSnS 4[36], also, Ghediya et al for CCTS absorber materials deposited by dip-coating technique[37] and Elsaeedy for CNTS absorber layers deposited by spray pyrolysis method[14].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The values are found to match with the previous literature. [47][48][49][50] As per the earlier reports, the Raman peak at 338 cm À1 corresponds to tetragonal kesterite CZTS. [51,52] Many others have reported the characteristic Raman peak for CZTS also at 330 cm À1 and suggested that the difference in the peak position is due to the lattice disorder caused by nonstoichiometry and the presence of internal stress in the material.…”
Section: Raman Studiessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…[51,52] Many others have reported the characteristic Raman peak for CZTS also at 330 cm À1 and suggested that the difference in the peak position is due to the lattice disorder caused by nonstoichiometry and the presence of internal stress in the material. [47][48][49][50] It is possible that due to the high concentration of intrinsic structural defects caused by local inhomogeneities, there exists a high degree of disorder in the cation sublattice [47,49,50,53] and the same is reflected as the variation in the Raman peak position. However, both kesterite CZTS nanocrystals (NCs) [34] with the A 1 mode Raman peak at 337 cm À1 and disordered kesterite CZTS [54,55] with the Raman peak around 330 cm À1 are reported to show good PEC activity.…”
Section: Raman Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%