Cu10Sn to Ti6Al4V bonding mechanisms in laser-based powder bed fusion multiple material additive manufacturing with different build strategies

Wei, Chao; Liu, Luchao; Cao, Huatang; Zhong, Xiangli; Xu, Xu; Gu, Yalong; Cheng, Dongxu; Huang, Yihe; Li, Zhaoqing; Guo, Wei; Li, Zhu; Li, Lin

doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102588

Cited by 17 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The selection of materials must be based on several factors, including the intended application, the properties required for the object, and the compatibility with the printing process. The materials must also be tested to ensure that they are compatible with each other [ 62 ].…”

Section: Challenges In Multimetal Additive Manufacturingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimetal Research in Powder Bed Fusion: A Review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the different forms of powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques, namely laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), electron beam powder bed fusion (EB-PBF) and large-area pulsed laser powder bed fusion (L-APBF). The challenges faced in multimetal additive manufacturing, including material compatibility, porosity, cracks, loss of alloying elements and oxide inclusions, have been extensively discussed. Solutions proposed to overcome these challenges include the optimization of printing parameters, the use of support structures, and post-processing techniques. Future research on metal composites, functionally graded materials, multi-alloy structures and materials with tailored properties are needed to address these challenges and improve the quality and reliability of the final product. The advancement of multimetal additive manufacturing can offer significant benefits for various industries.

show abstract

Section: Challenges In Multimetal Additive Manufacturingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimetal Research in Powder Bed Fusion: A Review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[11][12][13] Most of the titanium alloys with functional gradients are prepared based on differences in materials compositions, rather than on microstructural features such as grain size. [14][15][16][17][18] However, it should be noted that due to the poor solubility of titanium in other metallic elements, it is prone to forming thermodynamically stable intermetallic phases that can affect the mechanical properties of the alloy. In this regard, a new method of preparing functional gradient structures based on the inherent microstructural differences in the material itself has been proposed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deformation mechanisms based on the multiscale molecular dynamics of a gradient TA1 titanium alloy

Jiang,

Feng,

Tao

2024

Nanoscale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most existing publications have focused on the macroscopic mechanical properties of the printed multi-material parts, such as the interfacial characteristics [31,32], tensile or compressive behavior [33], and fracture toughness [27]; meanwhile, at the microscopic level, issues such as metallographic organization and element precession have also been covered [34][35][36]. Attempts are being made to clarify the scientific aspects of DED forming-'material-process (parameter)-property.'…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Printability disparities in heterogeneous material combinations via laser directed energy deposition: a comparative study

Ning,

Zhu,

Wang

et al. 2024

Int. J. Extrem. Manuf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive manufacturing provides achievability for the fabrication of bimetallic and multi-material structures; however, the material compatibility and bondability directly affect the parts’ formability and final quality. It is essential to understand the underlying printability of different material combinations based on an adapted process. Here, the printability disparities of two common and attractive material combinations (nickel- and iron-based alloys) are evaluated at the macro and micro levels via laser directed energy deposition (DED). The deposition processes were captured using in situ high-speed imaging, and the dissimilarities in melt pool features and track morphology were quantitatively investigated within specific process windows. Moreover, the microstructure diversity of the tracks and blocks processed with varied material pairs was comparatively elaborated and, complemented with the informative multi-physics modeling, the presented non-uniformity in mechanical properties (microhardness) among the heterogeneous material pairs was rationalized. The differences in melt flow induced by the unlike thermophysical properties of the material pairs and the resulting element intermixing and localized re-alloying during solidification dominate the presented dissimilarity in printability among the material combinations. This work provides an in-depth understanding of the phenomenological differences in the deposition of dissimilar materials and aims to guide more reliable DED forming of bimetallic parts.

show abstract

Cu10Sn to Ti6Al4V bonding mechanisms in laser-based powder bed fusion multiple material additive manufacturing with different build strategies

Cited by 17 publications

References 55 publications

Multimetal Research in Powder Bed Fusion: A Review

Multimetal Research in Powder Bed Fusion: A Review

Deformation mechanisms based on the multiscale molecular dynamics of a gradient TA1 titanium alloy

Printability disparities in heterogeneous material combinations via laser directed energy deposition: a comparative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About