2007
DOI: 10.1039/b616795k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu/ZnO and Cu/ZrO2interactions studied by contact angle measurement with TEM

Abstract: A technique of contact angle measurement was applied to the nano-scale oxide-supported metal particles. For Cu supported on ZnO and ZrO2 the angles were found to increase and the work of adhesion to decrease with increasing particle size. Such a trend is interpreted as an effect of negative contact line tension of 2.1 x 10(-9) J m(-1) and 1.0 x 10(-9) J m(-1) in the Cu/ZnO and Cu/ZrO2 system, correspondingly. For the small-sized Cu particles the apparent work of adhesion on ZnO support is higher than that on Z… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The very rich defect chemistry of ZnO [75] allows for such subtle distinctions. The assumption of different defect states of ZnO filling the spaces between particles and on the Cu particles helps explain the apparent discrepancy of the present model with the observations by electron microscopy [76] of a weak wetting interaction between Cu and ZnO without mentioning the possibility of its coexistence with a strongly wetting component of ZnO. Here the in-situ XPS provides complementary insight of a thin and strongly wetting ZnO that would not be visible in the TEM.…”
Section: Reduction Of a Cu/zno Nanostructured Systemcontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The very rich defect chemistry of ZnO [75] allows for such subtle distinctions. The assumption of different defect states of ZnO filling the spaces between particles and on the Cu particles helps explain the apparent discrepancy of the present model with the observations by electron microscopy [76] of a weak wetting interaction between Cu and ZnO without mentioning the possibility of its coexistence with a strongly wetting component of ZnO. Here the in-situ XPS provides complementary insight of a thin and strongly wetting ZnO that would not be visible in the TEM.…”
Section: Reduction Of a Cu/zno Nanostructured Systemcontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…As shown, for example, on Cu particles supported on ZnO or ZrO 2 for methanol synthesis, contact angles between particles and support (wetting effect) are measured based on electron micrographs (Figure 29a−m). 325,376 On both supports, the contact angles depend on the Cu particle size, but not linealy. They reach a stable value around 120°at the Cu equivalent diameter of about 6 nm (Figure 29o).…”
Section: Metal−support Interactionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6.2.5), by showing changes in the inter-atomic distances that reach the uppermost layers of the clusters far from the interface even for the largest sizes. The straining of the clusters could have consequences on the behavior of the supported clusters in experimental and reaction conditions, since many experimental studies of the industrial catalyst highlight the correlation between strain and reactivity [16,17,27]. The simulations also reveal the formation of multiple fcc domains separated by hcp regions (sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The industrial catalyst itself is usually prepared [12][13][14] by mixing the inorganic nitrate salts of Cu (in the highest proportion), Zn, and Al, co-precipitating with sodium carbonate, followed by steps of ageing, drying, calcination, reduction, and annealing at high temperature. Many atomic microscopy images of the commercial catalyst with techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) are available [15][16][17][18][19], revealing a complex mixture of Cu and ZnO nanoparticles. Most of the nanoparticles can be distinctly identified as being either copper or zinc oxide, but the particles are often stuck to one another, and even at this scale the structure of the interface between the materials is hard to discern.…”
Section: Summary and Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation