2009
DOI: 10.2113/econgeo.104.7.1055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu ISOTOPE RATIO VARIATIONS IN THE DIKULUSHI Cu-Ag DEPOSIT, DRC: OF PRIMARY ORIGIN OR INDUCED BY SUPERGENE REWORKING?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be emphasised, however, that the available data reflects a variety of base deposits and sulphide minerals only (galena, bornite, chalcocite, digenite, sphalerite, pyrite, chalcopyrite), of various geological ages (Cailteux and De Putter, 2019): LI ratios of the supergene deposits in the Copperbelt have not yet been characterised. These supergene deposits (iron oxides, malachite, chrysocolla and azurite) result from the secondary alteration of earlier diagenetic or hydrothermal sulphide deposits Haest et al, 2009). As discussed below, the croisette copper was most likely obtained from such supergene deposits, for which the LI ratios could differ from those reported here.…”
Section: Broad Trends: Lead Isotope Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be emphasised, however, that the available data reflects a variety of base deposits and sulphide minerals only (galena, bornite, chalcocite, digenite, sphalerite, pyrite, chalcopyrite), of various geological ages (Cailteux and De Putter, 2019): LI ratios of the supergene deposits in the Copperbelt have not yet been characterised. These supergene deposits (iron oxides, malachite, chrysocolla and azurite) result from the secondary alteration of earlier diagenetic or hydrothermal sulphide deposits Haest et al, 2009). As discussed below, the croisette copper was most likely obtained from such supergene deposits, for which the LI ratios could differ from those reported here.…”
Section: Broad Trends: Lead Isotope Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Its probable origin is in Paleoproterozoic metasediments from the Kasaï Block and it hence exhibits east-west gradients in the Copperbelt, with cobalt content overall decreasing from the western to the southeastern part of the Copperbelt, including the Zambian deposits (Dewaele et al, 2006;De Putter et al, 2018). By contrast, cobalt is less abundant or absent in "late" hydrothermal Cu-Pb-Zn deposits such as Kipushi (Heylen et al, 2008), Dikulushi (Haest et al, 2009(Haest et al, , 2010 and Kansanshi (Torrealday et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature sources that reported chalcocite as the major phase present in the copper isotope analyses were used [16][17][18][19] along with new data from Coates Lake, Copper Mine, Michigan, and Udokan. Data from Kupferschiefer [20], Michigan [21,22], and Coates Lake [23] provide classic examples of sedimentary copper deposits along with the prospect, Coppermine [24].…”
Section: Types Of Chalcocite Considered and Deposits Analyzedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is based on the application of Eq. 1: Fe, 57 Fe, 58 Ni, 62 Ni, 63 Cu, 65 Cu, 64 Zn, 66 Where Rcorr X,sample represents the corrected isotope ratio for the target analyte (Cu or Sn) in the sample (X0M 2 /M 1 , where M 1 and M 2 are the masses of the lighter and heavier isotope, respectively). Rexp X,sample represents the measured isotope ratio for the target analyte in the sample; Rexp IS,sample represents the measured isotope ratio for the internal standard admixed to the sample (i.e., Ni for Cu and Sb for Sn), and Rtheo X corresponds to the theoretical isotope ratio for the target element calculated based on the isotopic abundances given by the IUPAC [39].…”
Section: Instrumentation and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%