2022
DOI: 10.1177/03008916221122554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CtDNA-guided rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in RASwt metastatic colorectal cancer: Evidence from clinical practice

Abstract: Aim: To apply extended ctDNA-based RAS genotyping to clinical criteria for improving the selection of patients eligible for anti-EGFR-based rechallenge in a real-world setting. Methods: ctDNA testing was prospectively applied to RASwt mCRC progressed after a first-line anti-EGFR-containing regimen and at least one other line. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results: Among ten enrolled patients, the anti-EGFR rechallenge resulted in an objective response rate and disease control rate of 70… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,4 Despite the potential clinical relevance that rechallenge might represent in EGFR-dependent RAS WT mCRC, only a limited number of relatively small size and mostly retrospective anti-EGFR rechallenge studies has been published so far. [7][8][9][10] In this respect, CRICKET and CAVE phase II were the first prospective clinical trials that reported clinically meaningful antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile of rechallenge therapy with cetuximab in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan or with the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody avelumab, respectively, in a subset of patients with RAS WT mCRC [i.e., with RAS/BRAF WT disease at baseline, as assessed by liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA, (ctDNA)]. 11,12 Currently, analysis of RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA by liquid biopsy represents the only biomarker, that could identify patients that are potentially benefiting from anti-EGFR rechallenge, although new findings suggest that MAPK mutational status as well might be useful for rechallenge strategy.…”
Section: Novelty and Impact Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4 Despite the potential clinical relevance that rechallenge might represent in EGFR-dependent RAS WT mCRC, only a limited number of relatively small size and mostly retrospective anti-EGFR rechallenge studies has been published so far. [7][8][9][10] In this respect, CRICKET and CAVE phase II were the first prospective clinical trials that reported clinically meaningful antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile of rechallenge therapy with cetuximab in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan or with the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody avelumab, respectively, in a subset of patients with RAS WT mCRC [i.e., with RAS/BRAF WT disease at baseline, as assessed by liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA, (ctDNA)]. 11,12 Currently, analysis of RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA by liquid biopsy represents the only biomarker, that could identify patients that are potentially benefiting from anti-EGFR rechallenge, although new findings suggest that MAPK mutational status as well might be useful for rechallenge strategy.…”
Section: Novelty and Impact Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%