2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ctDNA as a biomarker of progression in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As new treatment strategies are arising for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, monitoring of response to neoadjuvant treatment and recognition of patients at risk for recurrence need to be optimized to enable personalized treatment choices [ 34 ]. Few studies on ctDNA measurements in the neoadjuvant setting of esophageal cancer patients have been reported [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Ococks et al mainly focused on minimal residual disease detection at the postoperative timepoint and did not use their post-CRT timepoint to correlate ctDNA detection with recurrence [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As new treatment strategies are arising for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, monitoring of response to neoadjuvant treatment and recognition of patients at risk for recurrence need to be optimized to enable personalized treatment choices [ 34 ]. Few studies on ctDNA measurements in the neoadjuvant setting of esophageal cancer patients have been reported [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Ococks et al mainly focused on minimal residual disease detection at the postoperative timepoint and did not use their post-CRT timepoint to correlate ctDNA detection with recurrence [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of our study is that, although we used tumor-informed mutation analysis with ultradeep sequencing to improve the sensitivity, ctDNA was still only detected prior to treatment in approximately half of the patients. Usage of a larger gene panel could have improved capturing the heterogeneous mutational landscape of esophageal cancers [ 23 , 40 ], thereby increasing the chance that more positions in the genome could be interrogated in the ctDNA which could increase sensitivity of the analysis. Copy number alterations are frequently found in esophageal tumors but the tumor load of patients in this cohort was too low for reliable copy number analysis in ctDNA [ 32 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this issue of ESMO Open , Bonazzi and colleagues 17 describe the results from a commercially available pancancer mutation panel evaluated in both ctDNA and tumor samples in a single cohort from resected EAC ( n = 57). Moreover, whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing was carried out on the primary tissue in a subset of patients ( n = 18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonazzi et al. 17 demonstrated that ctDNA variants can be detected in patients with EAC and has prognostic value for survival. However, the use of ctDNA as a predictive marker in patients with EAC is still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%