2000
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Versus Sonography for Monitoring Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Liver

Abstract: In this animal model, unenhanced CT was an effective way to monitor RF ablation compared with sonography because of increased lesion discrimination, reproducible decreased attenuation during ablation, and improved correlation to pathologic size.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
113
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was consistent with that of Komorizono and colleagues [26]. A larger tumor usually has a higher rate of local recurrence because it frequently requires multiple overlapping ablations, and targeting of its viable foci is difficult because of lack of clarity of the image obtained between the ablated and nonablated tumor after repeated ablation is performed under sonography [33]. Moreover, a high grade HCC probably has satellite nodules that are away from the main nodule, possibly implying that local recurrence in the same segment can be caused by satellite nodules that may be obscured under sonography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result was consistent with that of Komorizono and colleagues [26]. A larger tumor usually has a higher rate of local recurrence because it frequently requires multiple overlapping ablations, and targeting of its viable foci is difficult because of lack of clarity of the image obtained between the ablated and nonablated tumor after repeated ablation is performed under sonography [33]. Moreover, a high grade HCC probably has satellite nodules that are away from the main nodule, possibly implying that local recurrence in the same segment can be caused by satellite nodules that may be obscured under sonography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…37 In addition, it is usually difficult to differentiate treated or untreated tissue under sonography, and the formation of echogenic gas can limit the visibility of tumors during RFA. 21,39 Therefore, overlapping or repeated ablation procedures may lead to inaccurate positioning. The mean session numbers in PEI-treated patients with HCC has been reported to be much greater than that for RFA-treated patients, 19 and this can make it more difficult to achieve local tumor control by PEI compared with RFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two or more sessions and a longer ablative duration will be needed to create the area compared to only ablating the main tumor area without adequate safe margin. Unfortunately, repeated insertion and positioning of an electrode may result in inaccurate positioning because the safe margin is difficult to identify after the first treatment under sonogram, probably due to echogenic gas formation by the initial RFA [29] . Inadequate safe margin may be created due to the interference especially for larger tumor that needs repeated sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%