2016
DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2016021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis

Abstract: Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome without shortening of the arm. The purpose of this study is obtain CT scan evaluation of the glenoid bone stock in order to optimize glenoid component implantation and obtain a reference to determine optimal humeral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orientation of the scapular blade – also termed the “scapular border (SB)” – is the most commonly used such reference [ 9 ]. However, anatomical studies report significant variabilities in glenoid orientation (version, inclination, and rotation) relative to the scapula blade in normal non-arthritic scapulae [ 9 , 10 ], with measures of retroversion ranging from −5° to 10° [ 11 , 12 ]. All these factors influence the SB, and as a result, relying on a reference with such variability to plan or navigate in TSA may be misleading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation of the scapular blade – also termed the “scapular border (SB)” – is the most commonly used such reference [ 9 ]. However, anatomical studies report significant variabilities in glenoid orientation (version, inclination, and rotation) relative to the scapula blade in normal non-arthritic scapulae [ 9 , 10 ], with measures of retroversion ranging from −5° to 10° [ 11 , 12 ]. All these factors influence the SB, and as a result, relying on a reference with such variability to plan or navigate in TSA may be misleading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the neuroimaging eld, numerous groups have adapted different forms of ICC for assessing test-retest reliability in different applications of functional brain imaging [9,10]. Braun et al used ICC (3,1) and ICC (2,1) to study the reliability of a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)based graph theoretical approach [11]. In this study, ICC was used to quantify the reliability of MPR for measuring GT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no report about measurement of the precise size about greater tuberosity. There were several study reporting methods of bone structure measurement, including computed tomography (CT), 3D-CT imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2][3][4]. Most of these studies reported methods by CT measurement and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Peri-prosthetic osteolysis can be detected by radiographic techniques, such as CT, planar X-ray or MRI, as the pathology develops. 4, 5 Unfortunately, when the peri-implant osteolysis is radiographically confirmed, the condition is mostly irreversible, leaving revision surgery as the only treatment option which is more expensive, and often associated with poorer clinical outcomes. 68 Currently there is no US FDA approved therapeutic intervention for aseptic implant loosening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%