Computed Tomography 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26957-9_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Perfusion Techniques and Applications in Stroke and Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 We compared CTP stroke lesion thresholds for three deconvolution algorithms: (1) Fourier Transform-based deconvolution, 19 (2) model-based deconvolution with a plug flow model of contrast transport, 20,21 and (3) model-based deconvolution with a Johnson-Wilson-Lee (JWL) model of contrast transport. 22 The first two were implemented in-house as representative model-independent and model-dependent deconvolution methods. Of note, the model-independent deconvolution algorithm has been described in detail in a previous study 19 and was the algorithm incorporated into clinically-validated RAPID CTP software, so its CTP lesion thresholds (ischemic core: CBF<30%; penumbra: Tmax>6 s) were selected as the reference on which the other two methods’ thresholds were calibrated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17 We compared CTP stroke lesion thresholds for three deconvolution algorithms: (1) Fourier Transform-based deconvolution, 19 (2) model-based deconvolution with a plug flow model of contrast transport, 20,21 and (3) model-based deconvolution with a Johnson-Wilson-Lee (JWL) model of contrast transport. 22 The first two were implemented in-house as representative model-independent and model-dependent deconvolution methods. Of note, the model-independent deconvolution algorithm has been described in detail in a previous study 19 and was the algorithm incorporated into clinically-validated RAPID CTP software, so its CTP lesion thresholds (ischemic core: CBF<30%; penumbra: Tmax>6 s) were selected as the reference on which the other two methods’ thresholds were calibrated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the implementation details of the CTP4D algorithm is unavailable, the IRF of the JWL model of contrast transport is: 22 where W is the minimum transit time of contrast through the vasculature, E is the fraction of contrast with transit time > W , and k is a decay rate constant related to the heterogeneity of vascular transit time. Compared to the plug flow model, which assumes uniform transit time of contrast through vasculature, the JWL model appends an exponential decay following the boxcar IRF to account for heterogeneity in contrast transit time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maps were calculated by deconvolving the arterial input TDCs from the brain tissue TDCs from 3 × 3 pixel blocks of CT source images with use of the Johnson-Wilson-Lee model to estimate cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, mean transit time, and PS product. 24 BBB permeability should be close to zero, and a recent study has shown that its standard deviation is 0.24 mL/min/100 g. 25 For quantitative assessment, the parametric maps were analyzed by the same operator (F.S.) using custom software (Interactive Display Language v6.1; Research Systems, Boulder, CO).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial structures were built in PQSMOL. The initial geometry optimizations were carried out using density functional theory (DFT) and the B3LYP functional [57][58][59][60] using, successively, the 6-31G and the 6-31G+(d) basis set, as implemented in PQSMol. 61 Frequency calculations in PQSMOL were performed on all n=1.5 optimized structures to ensure stable minima were obtained.…”
Section: Epr Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%