1988
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.6.1317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT of aortic aneurysms: the distinction between mural and thrombus calcification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve studies have used CT to measure abdominal aortic calcification, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]43,[48][49][50][51] however, there is variation in the grading and location of these measurements. For example, Kimura et al 31 quantified the aortic calcification as a percentage of the cross sectional area of the aorta whereas, Miwa et al 32 although using a similar quantification method, expressed the calcification as a percentage of the aortic volume in their prospective study.…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twelve studies have used CT to measure abdominal aortic calcification, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]43,[48][49][50][51] however, there is variation in the grading and location of these measurements. For example, Kimura et al 31 quantified the aortic calcification as a percentage of the cross sectional area of the aorta whereas, Miwa et al 32 although using a similar quantification method, expressed the calcification as a percentage of the aortic volume in their prospective study.…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 The investigators reported a percentage of agreement for absence versus presence of progression of calcification of 88% with a k statistic of 0.74. Nakamura et al 39 on the other hand measured the length of abdominal aortic calcification by tracing the regions onto tracing EBCT Calcium score Abdominal aorta [27] EBCT Calcium score Abdominal aorta (right kidney to iliac bifurcation) [28] EBCT Calcium score Diaphragm to iliac bifurcation [29] CT Calcification grade Coeliac artery origin; left renal vein level; aortic bifurcation [30] CT Calcification volume SMA to iliac bifurcation [31] CT Aortic calcification area index (%) Above common iliac bifurcation [32] CT Aortic calcification volume (%) Above common iliac bifurcation [33] CT Atherosclerosis index Abdominal aorta (L3 or L4) [34] CT Degree of calcification (%) Aortic arch to bifurcation [35] CT Calcification grades SMA to bifurcation [43] CT Calcification volume (%) At and above common iliac bifurcation [48] CT Aortic calcification index Abdominal aorta [49] CT Vessel wall or thrombus calcification Abdominal aorta [50] CT Aortic calcification index Abdominal aorta [51] CT Aortic calcification index Abdominal aorta [36] X-ray Calcification grades Abdominal aorta [37] X-ray Calcification grades Abdominal aorta (T12-S1) [38] X-ray Calcification grades Aortic wall at each vertebral segment (L1-L4) [39] X-ray Calcific deposit length (mm) Abdominal aorta (L1-L5) [40] X-ray AAC index Abdominal aorta (L1-L4) [41] X-ray Aortic length involved Abdominal aorta (T12-S1) [42] X-ray Calcification grades Abdominal aorta [44] X-ray Calcification grade Abdominal aorta [45] X-ray Calcium score Abdominal aorta [46] X-ray Semi-quantitative score Abdominal aorta [47] X-ray Presence of calcium Abdominal aorta [52] X-ray Calcium score Abdominal aorta [53] X-ray Calcium score Abdominal aorta [54] X-ray Calcium score Abdominal aorta (L1-L4) AAC, abdominal aortic calc...…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, since aneurysm size does not completely represent the natural history of AAA [ 5 8 ] other risk factors, including calcification, have been investigated. Different degrees of mural calcification exist and the gravity of calcification seems to be associated with the risk of rupture [ 9 11 ]. Actually no prognostic indices to evaluate progression of calcification exist and repetition of imaging to monitor AAA expansion is necessary, with some important limitations such as cost or availability [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinical marker or imaging index reflecting the future expansion rate of AAAs could contribute to clinical decision-making regarding the most appropriate interval between serial scans of an AAA, as well as the most timely AAA repair, but such a useful marker or index remains to be elucidated. Because aortic calcification is a common finding in patients with AAA, 5 we considered the possibility that AAA calcification could be a potent candidate marker. Given the evidence that the AAA expansion rate is lower in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes, 6 despite the high susceptibility to advanced atherosclerosis as well as calcification in diabetic patients, AAA calcification and AAA expansion could be inversely correlated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%