1991
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.11.5.1947313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT evaluation of wall thickening in the alimentary tract.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A wall thickness greater than 5mm is considered abnormally thick [31] given that the distended wall of the esophagus is usually less than 3 mm [32] . Esophageal wall thickness asymmetry is a classic but nonspecific CT finding of esophageal cancer and esophageal wall thickness symmetry should always be considered when evaluating the esophagus by CT. CT has been shown to be less accurate when compared to other assessment modalities such as EUS [33] .…”
Section: T Stage Of Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wall thickness greater than 5mm is considered abnormally thick [31] given that the distended wall of the esophagus is usually less than 3 mm [32] . Esophageal wall thickness asymmetry is a classic but nonspecific CT finding of esophageal cancer and esophageal wall thickness symmetry should always be considered when evaluating the esophagus by CT. CT has been shown to be less accurate when compared to other assessment modalities such as EUS [33] .…”
Section: T Stage Of Esophageal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In addition, several reports in the literature have attempted to differentiate benign and malignant cases of BWT. [13][14][15] These studies are relatively small and, as yet, no consensus has emerged on how this issue should be tackled.…”
Section: General Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the clinical significance of this finding is being disputed, it has been reported to reflect mainly inflammatory bowel disease, bowel ischemia or colorectal carcinoma (1,2). However, it may also represent an incidental finding or an artifact without clinical significance (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%