1996
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199609000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Evaluation of Congenital Aural Atresia: What the Radiologist and Surgeon Need to Know

Abstract: Thus, a presurgical rating of 8 points translates into an 80% chance of restoring hearing to normal or near-normal levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Anterolateral displacement of stylomastoid foramen may make the nerve vulnerable to iatrogenic injury. 14 The facial nerve in the present case was found dehiscent with an unexpected hump formation. The dehiscence extended from the 2 nd genu towards the tympanic segment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Anterolateral displacement of stylomastoid foramen may make the nerve vulnerable to iatrogenic injury. 14 The facial nerve in the present case was found dehiscent with an unexpected hump formation. The dehiscence extended from the 2 nd genu towards the tympanic segment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Middle ear defects can be subtle or severe and include absent or maldevelopment of any of the ossicles, with alteration of other structures of common embryologic origin (such as the course of the facial nerve) (Fig 5). 12,[31][32][33] Jahrsdoerfer et al 34 described a 10-point rating scale for the selection of surgical candidates by comparing high-resolution CT findings with postsurgical hearing results. Using 9 reproducible criteria, one calculates a score to predict postoperative improvement of the speech-reception threshold ( Table 2).…”
Section: Auricular Atresiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7-10 mm. Yeakley & Jahrsdoerfer [58] betrachten eine Breite von mindestens 3 mm als Voraussetzung für eine erfolgreiche operative Rekonstruktion (vgl. Abbildungen 3 und 4).…”
Section: Computertomographie Der Großen Mittelohrfehlbildungen: Paukeunclassified