2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-008-0339-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT evaluation of cervical pedicle in a Chinese population for surgical application of transpedicular screw placement

Abstract: The lower cervical pedicle size differs between the Chinese and the non-Chinese population. Knowledge of pedicle dimensions and surface landmarks is crucial for the safe placement of screws, but few quantitative data concerning the lower cervical pedicle using CT scan and multiplanar reformations (MPR) in a Chinese population exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate lower cervical pedicle (C3-C7) dimensions in a Chinese population by computed axial tomography for surgical application. The dimensions of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
24
1
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
15
24
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the cervical pedicle surgical anatomy was well documented in North America, Asia, and Europe, [9,13,14] the anatomical parameters of the cervical spine pedicles may vary among different regions, and there are limited studies about a Latin American population, detailing bony landmarks and parameters to establish the ideal trajectory and feasibility of the cervical transpedicular screw technique. Our hypothesis was that morphometric parameters of the cervical pedicle of a Brazilian population would differ from previously reported data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the cervical pedicle surgical anatomy was well documented in North America, Asia, and Europe, [9,13,14] the anatomical parameters of the cervical spine pedicles may vary among different regions, and there are limited studies about a Latin American population, detailing bony landmarks and parameters to establish the ideal trajectory and feasibility of the cervical transpedicular screw technique. Our hypothesis was that morphometric parameters of the cervical pedicle of a Brazilian population would differ from previously reported data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,14,35 In our study, the mean PW and PH values were greater in males than in females and constantly increased from the cephalad to the caudad, as reported in the literature. 11,30,31 There were no significant differences between the right and left pedicles. The overall mean PH values were 1-2 mm greater than the PW values at all levels, as reported by Panjabi et al 28 and Kareikovic et al 14 The overall mean PH ranged from 6.2 to 7.5 mm in their studies, resembling the observations of Onibokun et al 27 None of the PH measurements was below 4 mm.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Morphological Feasibility Of Atps Fixationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3 Various biomechanical studies have shown that cervical pedicle screw has a better pullout strength than other posterior cervical fixation techniques and failure rate is significantly low. [4][5][6][7] The cervical pedicle surgical anatomy has been studied in North America, Asia, and Europe, [8][9][10][11][12] and it has anatomical parameters of the cervical spine pedicles that may differ in various regions. Indian population have been studied for cervical pedicle morphometry 13,14 but there are no studies about South Indian population without any cervical spine pathology.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,8 The transverse pedicle diameter increases from C3 to C7 in both male and female subjects. 9 We observed that mean transverse PW from C3 to C5 was found to be 5.4 mm in males and 4.6 mm in females, C6 to C7 was found to be 5.6 mm in males and 5.3 mm in females, so we recommend 5 mm pedicle screws in C3 to C5 for males and 4 mm pedicle screws for females, and 5.5 mm pedicle screws in males and 5 mm pedicle screws for females in C6, C7 region to avoid vascular and neural injuries (Graph 5, Table 5).…”
Section: Pedicle Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%