CT-Deployed Hydrajet Perforating in Horizontal Completions Provides New Approaches to Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing Applications

Abstract

The application of horizontal completions in lower-permeability formations is continuing to proliferate on a global scale. Caused either by formation damage issues or the very heterogeneous nature of many such reservoirs, actual wells will underperform when compared to original predictions from reservoir simulations. This will continue to result in a need for effective hydraulic-fracturing stimulations for many of these wells to reach economic production levels. Horizontal completions in moderate- to low-permeability reservoirs present the challenge of cost constraints that seldom allow the use of long-proven methods such as cemented completions and individual-fracturing of numerous zones with bridge plug isolation and multiple perforating runs. Some new methods being applied to overcome this problem require expensive downhole "jewelry" and some added risks that the liner and jewelry can be entirely run to the predetermined depth. In some methods, the operator must also accept reduced completion IDs that can later restrict production rates or hinder workover operations. These increased costs and risks must be accepted even before the actual fracturing treatments are attempted. This paper will discuss a new approach to controlled placement of multiple-stage fracturing treatments without the risks involved with packers or bridge plugs. By implementing a coiled tubing (CT) deployed hydrajet-perforating method, immediately followed by a fracturing treatment pumped down the annulus, the operator can use lower cost (and lower risk) liner completions, and delay the decision of selecting exactly where the perforated sections should be placed. In many cases, the final decisions on placement of the next perforated location can even be delayed until after the wellbore displacement of the preceding fracturing stage. By pumping the fracturing fluid slurry down the annulus of the CT and the casing the allowable frac rates can be higher than with tubing-deployed techniques. The total stimulation related costs are greatly reduced by being able to perforate/frac multiple times within the same day. Even where more than one day is required to complete the stimulation of all desired locations along the lateral, only one CT intervention and one pumping service company mobilization and rig-up will be needed, which will still improve the job economy over conventional methods. An additional benefit includes a reduction in the potential for excessive multiple fractures or near-wellbore tortuosity encountered with explosive charge perforating. Introduction The use of horizontal well completions in low- to very low-permeability reservoirs has seen a dramatic increase in many regions of the world. Horizontal completions offer the promise of reducing the number of wells drilled to effectively recover assets. For lower-permeability reservoirs, or even moderate-permeability reservoirs with vertical permeability anisotropy, the completions will often require multiple hydraulic fractures effectively spaced along the lateral to become more cost-effective than hydraulically fractured vertical well completions in the same reservoir. The most conventional approach to effective hydraulic fracturing stimulations in horizontal laterals1–5 in low-permeability reservoirs involve these procedures.Case and cement the lateral.Tubing-conveyed perforating (TCP) of the interval near the toe of the lateral using coiled tubing or tubing.Perform the fracture treatment by pumping through the casing.Flow the well to recover treatment fluid.Clean out the casing using coiled tubing or tubing.Isolate the fractured interval with a bridge plug.Use TCP to perforate the next interval uphole.

Hydraulic Fracturing Design Considerations and Optimal Usage of Water Resources for Middle Eastern Tight Gas Reservoirs

“…There have been considerable advancements in completion methods with respect to fracturing domain over the past few decades. Frac and pack, hydra-jet perforation, zipper fracking, proppant selection, fracturing fluid optimization, and fracture mapping coupled with microseismicity are some technologies that aided in the economical and efficient recovery from tight reservoirs. − …”

Pinpoint Fracturing Technologies: A Review of Successful Evolution of Multistage Fracturing in the Last Decade

“…The maximum number of individual fracture treatments performed on a single well so far is 39. The value of this technique has been well-documented in vertical well completions (McDaniel 2002;Beatty et al 2007;McDaniel et al 2006;East et al 2005). The initial and probably the best documented extensive use of the HPAP with PPD method occurred in the fairly shallow Diatomite play in California (Hejl et al 2006).…”

Conditioning Pre-existing Old Vertical Wells to Stimulate and Test Vaca Muerta Shale Productivity through the Application of Pinpoint Completion Techniques

“…This provides the benefit of selectively perforating desired zones to achieve a faster completion and to prevent unwanted sand stops (wash CT). This technique was introduced to the industry in 2004 (Surjaatmadja et al 2005) initially in vertical wells and was quickly applied in horizontal wells (McDaniel et al 2006). In Argentina, it has been used since 2006 (Bonapace et al 2009) and has been tested on a wide variety of conventional and tight reservoir gas wells (37 wells, 336 fracturing stages) in the Golfo San Jorge and Neuquén basins.…”