1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01213279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT demonstration of liquid intratumoral fat layering in a necrotic renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: We describe a case of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the kidney with CT evidence of fat that contradicts the rule that radiologically demonstrable fat is absent in renal carcinoma. The cyst-like appearance, egg-shell parietal calcifications, and extrarenal development of the mass suggested a preoperatively incorrect diagnosis of teratoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fat in these tumors is macroscopic and exhibits negative attenuation value on CT or as bright signal relative to subcutaneous or retroperitoneal fat tissue on T1-weighted MR images [2,3]. RCC, the most common malignant tumors arising from the kidney, rarely show this macroscopic fat on radiologic examinations, although rare exceptional cases have been reported sporadically [5][6][7][8][9]. With a usage of chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging, fat of lesser amount, or microscopic fat, which does not exhibit negative attenuation value on CT or bright signal on T1-weighted MR images, has become detectable.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The fat in these tumors is macroscopic and exhibits negative attenuation value on CT or as bright signal relative to subcutaneous or retroperitoneal fat tissue on T1-weighted MR images [2,3]. RCC, the most common malignant tumors arising from the kidney, rarely show this macroscopic fat on radiologic examinations, although rare exceptional cases have been reported sporadically [5][6][7][8][9]. With a usage of chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging, fat of lesser amount, or microscopic fat, which does not exhibit negative attenuation value on CT or bright signal on T1-weighted MR images, has become detectable.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, RCC can engulf perinephric or renal sinus fat [6]. Second, cholesterol necrosis can be misinterpreted as macroscopic fat [7,8]. Third, osseous metaplasia of the nonepithelial stromal portion of the tumour, with growth of fatty marrow elements and trabeculae, is a rare occurrence [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic evidence of fat within a renal mass can be seen in both AML and RCC, potentially complicating the radiographic diagnosis of AML versus RCC. Intratumoral adipose in RCC is usually associated with osseous metaplasia [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], but AML is also known to rarely present with calcifications [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, RCC has been reported to contain adipose without evidence of calcification on CT and/or pathologic analysis [3,[7][8][9]14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In RCC in which intratumoral adipose is present, the adipose is often associated with osseous metaplasia, defined as bone matrix with associated osteoblasts, osteoclasts, adipocytes, and/or hematopoietic cells [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The exact etiology of intratumoral adipose is unknown, but there are three recognized mechanisms by which Table 2) (10X magnification).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%